• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Public media communications about H1N1, risk perceptions and immunization behaviours: A Quebec?France comparison

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Published online before print August 13, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0963662513495149 Public Understanding of Science August 13, 2013 0963662513495149

Public media communications about H1N1, risk perceptions and immunization behaviours: A Quebec?France comparison

C?cile Rousseau cecile.rousseau@mcgill.ca
McGill University, Canada
Nicolas Moreau
University of Ottawa, Canada
Marie-Pier Dumas
McGill University, Canada
Ida Bost
CNRS Laboratoire d?Ethnologie et de Sociologie comparative, France
Sylvie Lefebvre
University Lyon II, France
La?titia Atlani-Duault
CNRS Laboratoire d?Ethnologie et de Sociologie comparative, France

Abstract

During the H1N1 pandemic, governments tailored their communications plans in order to influence risk perception and promote public compliance with the public health plan measures. Considering the volume and the content of calls to flu information centres as indicators of the public risk perception, this mixed method study compares the relation between public communications, risk perception and immunization behaviour in Quebec and France. Results suggest that advocating for clear information and coordination between health authorities and the media promotes adherence to preventive behaviour. However, over-exaggerating the risks and minimizing the population?s agency may undermine health authority credibility.


http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/08/07/0963662513495149.abstract
 
Back
Top Bottom