• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Randomized trial comparing the safety and antibody responses to live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine when administered to breastfeedin

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2018 Jun 28. pii: S0264-410X(18)30864-8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.036. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Randomized trial comparing the safety and antibody responses to live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccine when administered to breastfeeding women.[/h] Brady RC[SUP]1[/SUP], Jackson LA[SUP]2[/SUP], Frey SE[SUP]3[/SUP], Shane AL[SUP]4[/SUP], Walter EB[SUP]5[/SUP], Swamy GK[SUP]5[/SUP], Schlaudecker EP[SUP]6[/SUP], Szefer E[SUP]7[/SUP], Wolff M[SUP]7[/SUP], McNeal MM[SUP]6[/SUP], Bernstein DI[SUP]6[/SUP], Steinhoff MC[SUP]6[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) and inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) are both licensed for administration to nursing mothers. Little is known about the potential for transmission of LAIV viruses from the mother to the infant and the comparative breast milk antibody responses to LAIV and IIV.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] We performed a randomized, double-blind study comparing the immunogenicity of LAIV to IIV when administered to nursing mothers. The safety of LAIV to IIV in women and their infants was also compared. Women received LAIV + intramuscular placebo, or IIV + intranasal placebo on Day 0. Breast milk and nasal swabs (from women and infants) were collected on Days 0, 2, and 8 for detection of LAIV. Breast milk and serum antibody responses were measured at Days 0 and 28. The primary hypothesis was that LAIV would provide superior induction of breast milk IgA responses to influenza as compared to IIV when administered to nursing mothers.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Breast milk IgG, breast milk IgA (H1N1 only), serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI), and serum IgG responses were significantly higher following administration of IIV compared to LAIV. Receipt of either LAIV or IIV was safe in women and their infants. One (1%) LAIV recipient transmitted vaccine virus to her infant who remained well. No influenza virus was detected in breast milk.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Breast milk and serum antibody responses were higher for IIV compared to LAIV. LAIV and IIV were safe for nursing women but there was one (1%) possible transmission of LAIV to an infant. This study suggests that IIV may be the preferred vaccine for nursing mothers.
Copyright ? 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Breastfeeding; Immunogenicity; Inactivated influenza vaccine; Infants; Live attenuated influenza vaccine; Safety

PMID: 29961606 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.06.036
 
Back
Top Bottom