• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Rapid assessment of the reactogenicity of a 2016-2017 seasonal influenza vaccine: results from a feasibility study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2016 Nov 24. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Rapid assessment of the reactogenicity of a 2016-2017 seasonal influenza vaccine: results from a feasibility study.[/h] Stuurman AL[SUP]1[/SUP], Verstraeten T[SUP]1[/SUP], De Schryver A[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The European Medicines Agency (EMA) calls for a strategy for enhanced safety surveillance of seasonal influenza vaccines.
[h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] We assessed the feasibility of collecting reactogenicity data within one month of the start of the vaccination campaign in Belgium.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] One hundred subjects aged 18 to 65 years who had received inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine in occupational setting were enrolled. For 7 days after vaccination, subjects received a daily SMS with a link to a web-based questionnaire where reactogenicity events and their severity were solicited.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Data collection was completed by October 13th, 2016, before the peak of the vaccination campaign in Belgium. 68% of participants reported a local reaction and 65% a general reaction; 51% reported both a local and a general reaction.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Here we show that it has been possible to collect reactogenicity data in adults for enhanced safety surveillance in Belgium in a timely manner. The observed reactogenicity is higher compared to previous observations for this vaccine measured in clinical trials.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] European Medicines Agency guidance; adults; enhanced safety surveillance; reactogenicity; seasonal influenza vaccine

PMID: 27882801 DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2017.1264272
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom