AlaskaDenise
In Memoriam
We've just gone through a massive flooding event that has put residents in 7 different locations in total isolation for the forseeable future. I left work just hours before the bridge access was closed due to washouts under the supports of the 200+ foot high structure. We spent 2 days without phones, 911-capability, DSL, etc. The major road & rail routes between the states 2 biggest cities is closed for an unknown time. The "authorities" were unable to reach us. Our local few volunteers and numerous instant volunteers sandbagged, took in evacuees, etc.
This was an interesting event in that it provided an extensive view of emergency responses in an area-wide diaster.
- Most resources were directed to the more populated areas.
- Less populated areas were "on their own" except for their own few trained volunteers (who performed very well) & about 2-3 troopers.
- The most valuable people were local folks who knew where to get resources needed to deal with unforseen situations - they called folks in the middle of the night and asked them to bring their equipment to help - & they did just that.
- The value of in-home emergency preparations was obvious.
- One human "problem" were gawkers, who impeded performance of FD & volunteers - but that was dealth with quickly and effectively - the police announced they would arrest anyone who got in the way & the FD said vehicles blocking their way would be "forceably moved". Gawkers evaporated.
- Another human problem was those who didn't prepare to evacuate in advance, & those who waited too long.
I had participated in a planning session for just such an emergency. It was intersting to see how many important issues had been overlooked in our planning. "Battlefield decisions" saved the day.
The "official emergency planners" didn't participate in dealing with the actual emergency in the remote communities. Their "desk top" planning skills would have been nearly useless to solve critical problems.
.
This was an interesting event in that it provided an extensive view of emergency responses in an area-wide diaster.
- Most resources were directed to the more populated areas.
- Less populated areas were "on their own" except for their own few trained volunteers (who performed very well) & about 2-3 troopers.
- The most valuable people were local folks who knew where to get resources needed to deal with unforseen situations - they called folks in the middle of the night and asked them to bring their equipment to help - & they did just that.
- The value of in-home emergency preparations was obvious.
- One human "problem" were gawkers, who impeded performance of FD & volunteers - but that was dealth with quickly and effectively - the police announced they would arrest anyone who got in the way & the FD said vehicles blocking their way would be "forceably moved". Gawkers evaporated.
- Another human problem was those who didn't prepare to evacuate in advance, & those who waited too long.
I had participated in a planning session for just such an emergency. It was intersting to see how many important issues had been overlooked in our planning. "Battlefield decisions" saved the day.
The "official emergency planners" didn't participate in dealing with the actual emergency in the remote communities. Their "desk top" planning skills would have been nearly useless to solve critical problems.
.