• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Respir Med Case Rep . Recurrent positive nucleic acid detection in a recovered COVID-19 patient: A case report and literature review

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Respir Med Case Rep


. 2020 Jul 10;31:101152.
doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2020.101152. eCollection 2020.
Recurrent positive nucleic acid detection in a recovered COVID-19 patient: A case report and literature review


Teng Geling[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gong Huaizheng[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Chen Ying[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hu Hua[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: To describe a case of recurrent positive nucleic acid detection in a recovered coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patient and to provide clinical data for the further study of COVID-19.
Methods: A case of COVID-19 was retrospectively analyzed, and the relevant literature was reviewed.
Results: Based on the 6th edition of the COVID-19 treatment plan, the patient met the discharge standards after treatment and was discharged after consultation with the expert panel. Two weeks after discharge, nucleic acid testing of a sputum sample for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was positive again. There may be various reasons.
Conclusion: Recurring positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid tests pose a formidable challenge, and more stringent discharge standards should be considered. When considering recurrent positive nucleic acid results in COVID-19 patients, the clinicians should have a rational judgment.

Keywords: COVID-19; Nucleic acid detection; Recovering positive.
 
Back
Top Bottom