• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Respiration . Exercise Physiology at "Conversational Level" Is Not Impaired in Healthy Young Subjects Wearing Masks or Respirators

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Respiration


. 2022 May 5;1-10.
doi: 10.1159/000524490. Online ahead of print.
Exercise Physiology at "Conversational Level" Is Not Impaired in Healthy Young Subjects Wearing Masks or Respirators


Violeta Sanchez-Migallón[SUP] 1 [/SUP], César Calvo-Lobo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sandra Sanchez-Jorge[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mónica Arce[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Alejandra Vicente[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Elena Bello[SUP] 1 [/SUP], David Rodriguez-Sanz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], J L Chicharro[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Davinia Vicente-Campos[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the use of both surgical masks and FFP2 respirators on the inspiratory muscle strength, metabolic parameters, heart rate, subjective perceived exertion, and dyspnea perception, before and during 30 min stable load exercise at "conversational level".
Methods: A randomized cross-over study was carried out. Nineteen healthy adults completed 3 conditions (without a mask, with a surgical mask or an FFP2 respirator) during a 30-min steady-state test at the lactate threshold intensity. Inspiratory muscle strength was measured before and after the test, and metabolic parameters, heart rate, subjective perceived exertion, and dyspnea perception were collected at baseline, during, and after the test.
Results: There was a significant reduction in inspiratory muscle strength after the 30-min test in all conditions (control: 6.26 mm Hg, p < 0.5; surgical mask: 8.55 mm Hg, p < 0.01; FFP2 respirator: 12.42 mm Hg, p < 0.001), but without significant differences between them (p = 0.283). Data showed a statistically significant effect for time, but did not show a statistically significant interaction between condition and time for heart rate (p = 0.674), oxygen saturation (p = 0.297), blood lactate level (p = 0.991), rating perceived exertion (p = 0.734) and dyspnea (p = 0.532) comparisons.
Conclusions: The present study findings suggested that inspiratory muscle strength and physiological parameters during "conversational level" exercise were not impaired under wearing masks in healthy, nonsmoking young adults.

Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; Face masks; Low intensity exercise; Personal distancing; Sport.
 
Back
Top Bottom