• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Respirology . One-year follow-up CT findings in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Respirology


. 2022 Jun 12.
doi: 10.1111/resp.14311. Online ahead of print.
One-year follow-up CT findings in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis


Atsuyuki Watanabe[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matsuo So[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Masao Iwagami[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Koichi Fukunaga[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hisato Takagi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hiroki Kabata[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Toshiki Kuno[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) often causes radiological and functional pulmonary sequelae. However, evidence on 1-year follow-up of pulmonary sequelae is limited. We aimed to investigate the characteristics and time-course of pulmonary sequelae after recovery from COVID-19 through 1-year follow-up. We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases on 25 February 2022, and included studies with computed tomography (CT) findings at the 1-year follow-up. The extracted data on CT findings were analysed using a one-group meta-analysis. We further analysed the data in relation to COVID-19 severity, improvement rate and lung function. Fifteen eligible studies (N = 3134) were included. One year after COVID-19, 32.6% (95% CI 24.0-42.6, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 92.9%) presented with residual CT abnormalities. Ground-glass opacity and fibrotic-like changes were frequently observed in 21.2% (95% CI 15.4-28.4, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 86.7%) and 20.6% (95% CI 11.0-35.2, I[SUP]2[/SUP] = 91.9%), respectively. While the gradual recovery was seen on CT (52.9% [mid-term] vs. 32.6% [1 year]), the frequency of CT abnormalities was higher in the severe/critical cases than in the mild/moderate cases (37.7% vs. 20.7%). In particular, fibrotic changes showed little improvement between 4-7 months and 1 year after COVID-19. Pulmonary function tests at 1 year also showed the decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, especially in severe/critical cases. Our meta-analysis indicated that residual CT abnormalities were common in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 1 year after recovery, especially fibrotic changes in severe/critical cases. As these sequelae may last long, vigilant observations and longer follow-up periods are warranted.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; computed tomography; coronavirus disease; follow-up; pulmonary function test; sequelae.
 
Back
Top Bottom