• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Rheumatol Adv Pract . Antibody response to four doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an observational study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Rheumatol Adv Pract


. 2023 Nov 11;7(3):rkad097.
doi: 10.1093/rap/rkad097. eCollection 2023. Antibody response to four doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases: an observational study

Leher Gumber[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Hannah Jackson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nancy Gomez[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Georgina Hopkins[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Davis Tucis[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mithun Chakravorty[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Patrick Tighe[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Matthew J Grainge[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Megan Rutter[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Alastair Ferraro[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sheila Power[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Marie-Josèphe Pradère[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Peter C Lanyon[SUP] 1 2 6 [/SUP], Fiona A Pearce[SUP] 1 2 6 [/SUP], Lucy Fairclough[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: Antibody responses to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines are reduced among immunocompromised patients but are not well quantified among people with rare disease. We conducted an observational study to evaluate the antibody responses to the booster SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in people with rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases (RAIRD).
Methods: Blood samples were collected after second, before third, after third and after fourth vaccine doses. Anti-spike and anti-nucleocapsid antibody levels were measured using an in-house ELISA. Logistic regression models were built to determine the predictors for non-response. Results were compared with age- and sex-matched healthy controls.
Results: Forty-three people with RAIRD were included, with a median age of 56 years. Anti-spike seropositivity increased from 42.9% after second dose to 51.2% after third dose and 65.6% after fourth dose. Median anti-spike antibody levels increased from 33.6 (interquartile range 7.8-724.5) binding antibody units after second dose to 239.4 (interquartile range 35.8-1051.1) binding antibody units after the booster dose (third dose, or fourth dose if eligible). Of the participants who had sufficient antibody levels post-second dose, 22.2% had insufficient levels after the booster, and 34.9% of participants had lower antibodies after the booster than the lowest healthy control had after the second dose. Rituximab in the 6 months prior to booster (P = 0.02) and non-White ethnicity (P = 0.04) were associated with non-response. There was a dose-response relationship between the timing of rituximab and generation of sufficient antibodies (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: Although the booster dose increased anti-spike IgG and seropositivity rates, some people with RAIRD, particularly those on rituximab, had insufficient antibody levels despite three or four doses.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; antibody; rare autoimmune rheumatic diseases; rituximab; vaccination.

 
Back
Top Bottom