tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep
. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23511.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74629-5. Comparative analyses of post-infectious olfactory dysfunction between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases
Tae-Seong Eo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yeonsu Jeong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hyung-Ju Cho[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Min-Seok Rha[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Chang-Hoon Kim[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
To identify the differences between COVID-19-associated and non-COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction (OD), we analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics based on the causative virus (COVID versus non-COVID groups) in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD) who underwent the olfactory questionnaire and olfactory function test. Out of 169 patients with PIOD, 99 were diagnosed with COVID-19 (COVID group), while 70 were not (non-COVID group). The COVID group was younger and had a higher percentage of male patients as well as patients with parosmia than the non-COVID group. In the initial olfactory function tests, the TDI, discrimination and identification scores were significantly higher in the COVID group than in the non-COVID group. TDI scores were significantly increased in patients with PIOD after treatment, regardless of the group. The threshold score was significantly increased by 1.38 in the COVID group while the identification score was significantly increased by 2.67 in the non-COVID group. Patients with COVID-19-associated OD were younger in age, tended to be male, had a higher incidence of parosmia, and had better initial olfactory function test results compared to those with non-COVID-19-associated OD. Following treatment, odor detection threshold improved in the COVID group, whereas odor identification improved in the non-COVID group.
Keywords: COVID-19; Olfaction disorders; Olfactory training; SARS-CoV-2; Smell.
. 2024 Oct 9;14(1):23511.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74629-5. Comparative analyses of post-infectious olfactory dysfunction between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases
Tae-Seong Eo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yeonsu Jeong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hyung-Ju Cho[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Min-Seok Rha[SUP] 3 4 [/SUP], Chang-Hoon Kim[SUP] 5 6 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39379543
- PMCID: PMC11461854
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74629-5
To identify the differences between COVID-19-associated and non-COVID-19-associated olfactory dysfunction (OD), we analyzed demographic and clinical characteristics based on the causative virus (COVID versus non-COVID groups) in patients with post-infectious olfactory dysfunction (PIOD) who underwent the olfactory questionnaire and olfactory function test. Out of 169 patients with PIOD, 99 were diagnosed with COVID-19 (COVID group), while 70 were not (non-COVID group). The COVID group was younger and had a higher percentage of male patients as well as patients with parosmia than the non-COVID group. In the initial olfactory function tests, the TDI, discrimination and identification scores were significantly higher in the COVID group than in the non-COVID group. TDI scores were significantly increased in patients with PIOD after treatment, regardless of the group. The threshold score was significantly increased by 1.38 in the COVID group while the identification score was significantly increased by 2.67 in the non-COVID group. Patients with COVID-19-associated OD were younger in age, tended to be male, had a higher incidence of parosmia, and had better initial olfactory function test results compared to those with non-COVID-19-associated OD. Following treatment, odor detection threshold improved in the COVID group, whereas odor identification improved in the non-COVID group.
Keywords: COVID-19; Olfaction disorders; Olfactory training; SARS-CoV-2; Smell.