tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep
. 2024 May 6;14(1):10416.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60788-y. Information processing style and institutional trust as factors of COVID vaccine hesitancy
Wanchen Zhao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Catherine Maya Russell[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anastasia Jankovsky[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tyrone D Cannon[SUP] 3 2 4 [/SUP], Christopher Pittenger[SUP] 3 2 4 5 6 [/SUP], Helen Pushkarskaya[SUP] 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
This study investigates the factors contributing to COVID vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy has commonly been attributed to susceptibility to misinformation and linked to particular socio-demographic factors and personality traits. We present a new perspective, emphasizing the interplay between individual cognitive styles and perceptions of public health institutions. In January 2020, before the COVID-19 pandemic, 318 participants underwent a comprehensive assessment, including self-report measures of personality and clinical characteristics, as well as a behavioral task that assessed information processing styles. During 2021, attitudes towards vaccines, scientists, and the CDC were measured at three time points (February-October). Panel data analysis and structural equation modeling revealed nuanced relationships between these measures and information processing styles over time. Trust in public health institutions, authoritarian submission, and lower information processing capabilities together contribute to vaccine acceptance. Information processing capacities influenced vaccination decisions independently from the trust level, but their impact was partially mediated by authoritarian tendencies. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of vaccine hesitancy, which emerges as a product of interactions between individual cognitive styles and perceptions of public health institutions. This novel perspective provides valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms that drive this complex phenomenon.
. 2024 May 6;14(1):10416.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60788-y. Information processing style and institutional trust as factors of COVID vaccine hesitancy
Wanchen Zhao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Catherine Maya Russell[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anastasia Jankovsky[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tyrone D Cannon[SUP] 3 2 4 [/SUP], Christopher Pittenger[SUP] 3 2 4 5 6 [/SUP], Helen Pushkarskaya[SUP] 7 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38710827
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60788-y
This study investigates the factors contributing to COVID vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy has commonly been attributed to susceptibility to misinformation and linked to particular socio-demographic factors and personality traits. We present a new perspective, emphasizing the interplay between individual cognitive styles and perceptions of public health institutions. In January 2020, before the COVID-19 pandemic, 318 participants underwent a comprehensive assessment, including self-report measures of personality and clinical characteristics, as well as a behavioral task that assessed information processing styles. During 2021, attitudes towards vaccines, scientists, and the CDC were measured at three time points (February-October). Panel data analysis and structural equation modeling revealed nuanced relationships between these measures and information processing styles over time. Trust in public health institutions, authoritarian submission, and lower information processing capabilities together contribute to vaccine acceptance. Information processing capacities influenced vaccination decisions independently from the trust level, but their impact was partially mediated by authoritarian tendencies. These findings underscore the multifactorial nature of vaccine hesitancy, which emerges as a product of interactions between individual cognitive styles and perceptions of public health institutions. This novel perspective provides valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms that drive this complex phenomenon.