tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Rep
. 2023 Mar 4;13(1):3675.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30803-9.
The importance of high quality real-life social interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic
Maximilian Monninger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pascal-M Aggensteiner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tania M Pollok[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Kaiser[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Iris Reinhard[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Andrea Hermann[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Markus Reichert[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Daniel Brandeis[SUP] 1 8 9 [/SUP], Tobias Banaschewski[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nathalie E Holz[SUP] 10 11 12 13 14 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic has brought about dramatic restrictions to real-life social interactions and a shift towards more online social encounters. Positive social interactions have been highlighted as an important protective factor, with previous studies suggesting an involvement of the amygdala in the relationship between social embeddedness and well-being. The present study investigated the effect of the quality of real-life and online social interactions on mood, and explored whether this association is affected by an individual's amygdala activity. Sixty-two participants of a longitudinal study took part in a one-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) during the first lockdown, reporting their momentary well-being and their engagement in real-life and online social interactions eight times per day (N ~ 3000 observations). Amygdala activity was assessed before the pandemic during an emotion-processing task. Mixed models were calculated to estimate the association between social interactions and well-being, including two-way interactions to test for the moderating effect of amygdala activity. We found a positive relationship between real-life interactions and momentary well-being. In contrast, online interactions had no effect on well-being. Moreover, positive real-life social interactions augmented this social affective benefit, especially in individuals with higher amygdala being more sensitive to the interaction quality. Our findings demonstrate a mood-lifting effect of positive real-life social interactions during the pandemic, which was dependent on amygdala activity before the pandemic. As no corresponding effect was found between online social interactions and well-being, it can be concluded that increased online social interactions may not compensate for the absence of real-life social interactions.
. 2023 Mar 4;13(1):3675.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30803-9.
The importance of high quality real-life social interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic
Maximilian Monninger[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pascal-M Aggensteiner[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tania M Pollok[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Kaiser[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Iris Reinhard[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Andrea Hermann[SUP] 3 4 5 [/SUP], Markus Reichert[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Ulrich W Ebner-Priemer[SUP] 6 7 [/SUP], Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Daniel Brandeis[SUP] 1 8 9 [/SUP], Tobias Banaschewski[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nathalie E Holz[SUP] 10 11 12 13 14 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 36871079
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30803-9
Abstract
The coronavirus pandemic has brought about dramatic restrictions to real-life social interactions and a shift towards more online social encounters. Positive social interactions have been highlighted as an important protective factor, with previous studies suggesting an involvement of the amygdala in the relationship between social embeddedness and well-being. The present study investigated the effect of the quality of real-life and online social interactions on mood, and explored whether this association is affected by an individual's amygdala activity. Sixty-two participants of a longitudinal study took part in a one-week ecological momentary assessment (EMA) during the first lockdown, reporting their momentary well-being and their engagement in real-life and online social interactions eight times per day (N ~ 3000 observations). Amygdala activity was assessed before the pandemic during an emotion-processing task. Mixed models were calculated to estimate the association between social interactions and well-being, including two-way interactions to test for the moderating effect of amygdala activity. We found a positive relationship between real-life interactions and momentary well-being. In contrast, online interactions had no effect on well-being. Moreover, positive real-life social interactions augmented this social affective benefit, especially in individuals with higher amygdala being more sensitive to the interaction quality. Our findings demonstrate a mood-lifting effect of positive real-life social interactions during the pandemic, which was dependent on amygdala activity before the pandemic. As no corresponding effect was found between online social interactions and well-being, it can be concluded that increased online social interactions may not compensate for the absence of real-life social interactions.