tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Total Environ
. 2021 Oct 4;150786.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150786. Online ahead of print.
Defining biological and biophysical properties of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in wastewater
Carolyn A Robinson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hsin-Yeh Hsieh[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shu-Yu Hsu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yang Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Braxton T Salcedo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anthony Belenchia[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jessica Klutts[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sally Zemmer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Melissa Reynolds[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Elizabeth Semkiw[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Trevor Foley[SUP] 6 [/SUP], XiuFeng Wan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Chris G Wieberg[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jeff Wenzel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Chung-Ho Lin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Marc C Johnson[SUP] 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 genetic material has been detected in raw wastewater around the world throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and has served as a useful tool for monitoring community levels of SARS-CoV-2 infections. SARS-CoV-2 genetic material is highly detectable in a patient's feces and the household wastewater for several days before and after a positive COVID-19 qPCR test from throat or sputum samples. Here, we characterize genetic material collected from raw wastewater samples and determine recovery efficiency during a concentration process. We find that pasteurization of raw wastewater samples did not reduce SARS-CoV-2 signal if RNA is extracted immediately after pasteurization. On the contrary, we find that signal decreased by approximately half when RNA was extracted 24-36 h post-pasteurization and ~90% when freeze-thawed prior to concentration. As a matrix control, we use an engineered enveloped RNA virus. Surprisingly, after concentration, the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 signal is consistently higher than the recovery of the control virus leading us to question the nature of the SARS-CoV-2 genetic material detected in wastewater. We see no significant difference in signal after different 24-hour temperature changes; however, treatment with detergent decreases signal ~100-fold. Furthermore, the density of the samples is comparable to enveloped retrovirus particles, yet, interestingly, when raw wastewater samples were used to inoculate cells, no cytopathic effects were seen indicating that wastewater samples do not contain infectious SARS-CoV-2. Together, this suggests that wastewater contains fully intact enveloped particles.
Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Pasteurization; Sewage; Surveillance; Wastewater.
. 2021 Oct 4;150786.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150786. Online ahead of print.
Defining biological and biophysical properties of SARS-CoV-2 genetic material in wastewater
Carolyn A Robinson[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Hsin-Yeh Hsieh[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Shu-Yu Hsu[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yang Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Braxton T Salcedo[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anthony Belenchia[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jessica Klutts[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Sally Zemmer[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Melissa Reynolds[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Elizabeth Semkiw[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Trevor Foley[SUP] 6 [/SUP], XiuFeng Wan[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Chris G Wieberg[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Jeff Wenzel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Chung-Ho Lin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Marc C Johnson[SUP] 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34619200
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150786
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 genetic material has been detected in raw wastewater around the world throughout the COVID-19 pandemic and has served as a useful tool for monitoring community levels of SARS-CoV-2 infections. SARS-CoV-2 genetic material is highly detectable in a patient's feces and the household wastewater for several days before and after a positive COVID-19 qPCR test from throat or sputum samples. Here, we characterize genetic material collected from raw wastewater samples and determine recovery efficiency during a concentration process. We find that pasteurization of raw wastewater samples did not reduce SARS-CoV-2 signal if RNA is extracted immediately after pasteurization. On the contrary, we find that signal decreased by approximately half when RNA was extracted 24-36 h post-pasteurization and ~90% when freeze-thawed prior to concentration. As a matrix control, we use an engineered enveloped RNA virus. Surprisingly, after concentration, the recovery of SARS-CoV-2 signal is consistently higher than the recovery of the control virus leading us to question the nature of the SARS-CoV-2 genetic material detected in wastewater. We see no significant difference in signal after different 24-hour temperature changes; however, treatment with detergent decreases signal ~100-fold. Furthermore, the density of the samples is comparable to enveloped retrovirus particles, yet, interestingly, when raw wastewater samples were used to inoculate cells, no cytopathic effects were seen indicating that wastewater samples do not contain infectious SARS-CoV-2. Together, this suggests that wastewater contains fully intact enveloped particles.
Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Pasteurization; Sewage; Surveillance; Wastewater.