• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sci Total Environ . Evaluation of supercritical CO 2 sterilization efficacy for sanitizing personal protective equipment from the coronavirus SARS-

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sci Total Environ


. 2021 Mar 18;780:146519.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146519. Online ahead of print.
Evaluation of supercritical CO [SUB]2[/SUB] sterilization efficacy for sanitizing personal protective equipment from the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2


Devasier Bennet[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ashlee F Harris[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jerome Lacombe[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Carla Brooks[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Nina Bionda[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Aaron D Strickland[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Tony Eisenhut[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Frederic Zenhausern[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO[SUB]2[/SUB]) sterilization-based NovaClean process for decontamination and reprocessing of personal protective equipment (PPE) such as surgical masks, cloth masks, and N95 respirators. Preliminarily, Bacillus atrophaeus were inoculated into different environments (dry, hydrated, and saliva) to imitate coughing and sneezing and serve as a "worst-case" regarding challenged PPE. The inactivation of the microbes by scCO[SUB]2[/SUB] sterilization with NovaKill or H[SUB]2[/SUB]O[SUB]2[/SUB] sterilant was investigated as a function of exposure times ranging from 5 to 90 min with a goal of elucidating possible mechanisms. Also, human coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 and HCoV-NL63 were inoculated on the respirator material, and viral activity was determined post-treatment. Moreover, we investigated the reprocessing ability of scCO[SUB]2[/SUB]-based decontamination using wettability testing and surface mapping. Different inactivation mechanisms have been identified in scCO[SUB]2[/SUB] sanitization, such as membrane damage, germination defect, and dipicolinic acid leaks. Moreover, the viral sanitization results showed a complete inactivation of both coronavirus HCoV-NL63 and SARS-CoV-2. We did not observe changes in PPE morphology, topographical structure, or material integrity, and in accordance with the WHO recommendation, maintained wettability post-processing. These experiments establish a foundational understanding of critical elements for the decontamination and reuse of PPE in any setting and provide a direction for future research in the field.

Keywords: Bacillus atrophaeus endospore; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Face mask; HCoV-NL63; Supercritical carbon dioxide.
 
Back
Top Bottom