• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Serologic and Virologic Evidence of Influenza A Viruses in Wild Boars ( Sus scrofa) from Two Different Locations in Italy

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Wildl Dis. 2018 Sep 20. doi: 10.7589/2017-11-285. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Serologic and Virologic Evidence of Influenza A Viruses in Wild Boars ( Sus scrofa) from Two Different Locations in Italy.[/h] Delogu M[SUP]1[/SUP], Cotti C[SUP]1[/SUP], Vaccari G[SUP]2[/SUP], Raffini E[SUP]3[/SUP], Frasnelli M[SUP]3[/SUP], Nicoloso S[SUP]4[/SUP], Biacchessi V[SUP]1[/SUP], Boni A[SUP]2[/SUP], Foni E[SUP]5[/SUP], Castrucci MR[SUP]6[/SUP], De Marco MA[SUP]7[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] Swine influenza viruses (SIVs) have been repeatedly demonstrated to circulate in wild boar ( Sus scrofa) populations, whereas no evidence of exposure to avian influenza viruses (AIVs) has been described in wild boar. To better understand how different environments may influence the ecology of influenza A viruses (IAVs) in wild suid populations, we examined biologic samples of wild boars from two study areas represented by an upland (UL) and a wetland (WL) in northern and central Italy, respectively. Serum samples were collected from 388 wild boars sampled in the UL, whereas both a serum sample and a nasal swab were obtained from each of 35 wild boars sampled in the WL. Twenty of 388 (5.2%) sera from the UL were positive by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the presence of antibodies against influenza A nucleoprotein and some of these samples showed antibodies by hemagglutination inhibition to SIVs of H1N1 (1/20), H1N2 (10/20), and H3N2 (1/20) antigenic subtypes. No IAV-seropositive wild boar was detected in the WL, although one of 35 animals was found to be IAV-positive by both a reverse transcriptase PCR and a real-time reverse transcriptase PCR. We hypothesize an SIV exposure for IAV-seropositive wild boars occupying the UL, whereas a possible AIV spillover from aquatic bird species-natural reservoirs of IAVs-to wild boars in the WL cannot be ruled out. Further research is needed to better understand the role played by wild boars in IAV ecology in Mediterranean habitats.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Antibodies; Italy; Sus scrofa; ecology; influenza A virus; upland; wetland; wild boars

PMID: 30235085 DOI: 10.7589/2017-11-285
 
Back
Top Bottom