• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sociocultural determinants of anticipated acceptance of pandemic influenza vaccine in Pune, India: a community survey using mixed-methods

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Int J Public Health. 2016 Sep 22. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Sociocultural determinants of anticipated acceptance of pandemic influenza vaccine in Pune, India: a community survey using mixed-methods.[/h] Sundaram N[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]3[/SUP], Schaetti C[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Grize L[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Purohit V[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Joseph S[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Schindler C[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP], Kudale A[SUP]6,[/SUP][SUP]7[/SUP], Weiss MG[SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To investigate community priority and determinants of pandemic influenza vaccine acceptance in Pune, India. Community willingness to accept vaccines is often neglected in pandemic preparedness. Despite an acknowledged need, few such studies have been done in lower income countries.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study used semi-structured explanatory model interviews to assess anticipated acceptance of nasal and injectable vaccines at different prices among 436 urban and rural residents. Logistic regression models identified sociocultural determinants of vaccine acceptance.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Over 93 % anticipated acceptance at no-cost; 87.8 % for INR 150 nasal vaccine; 74.1 % for INR 500 and 61.7 % for INR 1000 injectable vaccines. Some respondents preferred low-cost over free vaccines. Illness-related concerns about social isolation, contaminants identified as perceived causes, private-hospital or traditional-healer help seeking, and income were positively associated with anticipated acceptance. Humoral imbalances as perceived cause, home remedies for help-seeking and age were negatively associated.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] High acceptability of pandemic influenza vaccines indicates good prospects for mass vaccination. It appeared that confidence was higher in the vaccines than in the health systems delivering them. Vaccination programmes should consider sociocultural determinants influencing vaccine acceptance.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Cultural characteristics; Influenza; Pandemic; Public participation; Social characteristics; Vaccination

PMID: 27658812 DOI: 10.1007/s00038-016-0903-z
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom