• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Strategies to increase influenza vaccination rates: outcomes of a nationwide cross-sectional survey of UK general practice

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
BMJ Open. 2012 May 11;2(3). pii: e000851. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000851. Print 2012.
Strategies to increase influenza vaccination rates: outcomes of a nationwide cross-sectional survey of UK general practice.
Dexter LJ, Teare MD, Dexter M, Siriwardena AN, Read RC.
Source

Department of Infection and Immunity, The University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:

To identify practice strategies associated with higher flu vaccination rates in primary care.
DESIGN:

Logistic regression analysis of data from a cross-sectional online questionnaire.
SETTING:

795 general practices across England.
PARTICIPANTS:

569 practice managers, 335 nursing staff and 107 general practitioners.
PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES:

Flu vaccination rates achieved by each practice in different groups of at-risk patients.
RESULTS:

7 independent factors associated with higher vaccine uptake were identified. Having a lead staff member for planning the flu campaign and producing a written report of practice performance predicted an 8% higher vaccination rate for at-risk patients aged <65 years (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.71). These strategies, plus sending a personal invitation to all eligible patients and only stopping vaccination when Quality and Outcomes Framework targets are reached, predicted a 7% higher vaccination rate (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.92) in patients aged ≥65 years. Using a lead member of staff for identifying eligible patients, with either a modified manufacturer's or in-house search programme for interrogating the practice IT system, independently predicted a 4% higher vaccination rate in patients aged ≥65 years (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.41/OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.40). The provision of flu vaccine by midwives was associated with a 4% higher vaccination rate in pregnant women (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.40).
CONCLUSIONS:

Clear leadership, effective communication about performance and methods used to identify and contact eligible patients were independently associated with significantly higher rates of flu vaccination. Financial targets appear to incentivise practices to work harder to maximise seasonal influenza vaccine uptake. The strategies identified here could help primary care providers to substantially increase their seasonal flu vaccination rates towards or even above the Chief Medical Officer's targets.

PMID:
22581793
[PubMed - in process]

Free full text

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22581793
 
Back
Top Bottom