• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Summary of knowledge gaps related to quality and efficacy of current influenza vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine. 2014 Jun 19. pii: S0264-410X(14)00694-X. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.05.027. [Epub ahead of print]
Summary of knowledge gaps related to quality and efficacy of current influenza vaccines.
Mura M1, Pfleiderer M2, Trouvin JH3, Brasseur D4, Granstrom M5, Shivji R6, Cavaleri M6.
Author information
Abstract

Influenza viruses are a public health threat, as they are pathogenic, highly transmissible and prone to genetic changes. For decades vaccination strategies have been based on trivalent inactivated vaccines, which are regulated by specific guidelines. The progress in scientific knowledge and the lessons learned from the A(H1N1)2009 pandemic have highlighted further the need to improve current guidelines, including the immunogenicity criteria set by the CHMP in 1997, and to promote the discussion on the shortcomings encountered, e.g. the evaluation of vaccine efficacy in the paediatric and elderly populations, the measurement of the naivety of a population, the impact of prior immunity on subsequent vaccinations, and the technical issues with the serological assays for detection of immunity and immunogenicity. The authors attempted to summarise and tackle key gaps in the existing evidence concerning quality and efficacy of influenza vaccines, aiming at favouring a common understanding and a coordinated approach across stakeholders.

Copyright ? 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
KEYWORDS:

Influenza vaccination; Pandemic; Serological criteria; Stakeholders; Vaccine efficacy

PMID:
24954696
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24954696
 
Back
Top Bottom