tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Surgery
. 2021 Sep 9;S0039-6060(21)00873-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.051. Online ahead of print.
Rotational thromboelastometry in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome owing to coronavirus disease 2019: Is there a viscoelastic fingerprint and a role for predicting thrombosis?
Ljiljana V Vasovic[SUP] 1 [/SUP], James Littlejohn[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dalia Alqunaibit[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alicia Dillard[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yuqing Qiu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sophie Rand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew Bronstein[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Cameron J Gibson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anton G Kelly[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christina Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jennifer A Minneman[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mayur Narayan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jian Shou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kira E Smith[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Cassandra V Villegas[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Robert J Winchell[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Melissa M Cushing[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philip S Barie[SUP] 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated rotational thromboelastometry tracings in 44 critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients, to determine whether there is a viscoelastic fingerprint and to test the hypothesis that the diagnosis and prediction of venous thromboembolism would be enhanced by the addition of rotational thromboelastometry testing.
Results: Rotational thromboelastometry values reflected an increase in clot strength for the EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM assays beyond the reference range. No hyperfibrinolysis was noted. Fibrinolysis shutdown was present but did not correlate with thrombosis; 32% (14/44) of patients experienced a thrombotic episode. For every 1 mm increase of FIBTEM maximum clot formation, the odds of developing thrombosis increased 20% (95% confidence interval, 0-40%, P = .043), whereas for every 1,000 ng/mL increase in D-dimer, the odds of thrombosis increased by 70% (95% confidence interval, 20%-150%, P = .004), after adjustment for age and sex (AUC 0.96, 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.00). There was a slight but significant improvement in model performance after adding FIBTEM maximum clot formation and EXTEM clot formation time to D-dimer in a multivariable model (P = .04).
Conclusions: D-dimer concentrations were more predictive of thrombosis in our patient population than any other parameter. Rotational thromboelastometry confirmed the hypercoagulable state of coronavirus disease 2019 intensive care unit patients. FIBTEM maximum clot formation and EXTEM clot formation time increased the predictability for thrombosis compared with only using D-dimer. Rotational thromboelastometry analysis is most useful in augmenting the information provided by the D-dimer concentration for venous thromboembolism risk assessment when the D-dimer concentration is between 1,625 and 6,900 ng/dL, but the enhancement is modest. Fibrinolysis shutdown did not correlate with thrombosis.
. 2021 Sep 9;S0039-6060(21)00873-4.
doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.051. Online ahead of print.
Rotational thromboelastometry in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome owing to coronavirus disease 2019: Is there a viscoelastic fingerprint and a role for predicting thrombosis?
Ljiljana V Vasovic[SUP] 1 [/SUP], James Littlejohn[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Dalia Alqunaibit[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alicia Dillard[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yuqing Qiu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Sophie Rand[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Matthew Bronstein[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Cameron J Gibson[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anton G Kelly[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Christina Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jennifer A Minneman[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mayur Narayan[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jian Shou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kira E Smith[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Cassandra V Villegas[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Robert J Winchell[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Melissa M Cushing[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Philip S Barie[SUP] 5 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35090739
- DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.08.051
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated rotational thromboelastometry tracings in 44 critically ill coronavirus disease 2019 patients, to determine whether there is a viscoelastic fingerprint and to test the hypothesis that the diagnosis and prediction of venous thromboembolism would be enhanced by the addition of rotational thromboelastometry testing.
Results: Rotational thromboelastometry values reflected an increase in clot strength for the EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM assays beyond the reference range. No hyperfibrinolysis was noted. Fibrinolysis shutdown was present but did not correlate with thrombosis; 32% (14/44) of patients experienced a thrombotic episode. For every 1 mm increase of FIBTEM maximum clot formation, the odds of developing thrombosis increased 20% (95% confidence interval, 0-40%, P = .043), whereas for every 1,000 ng/mL increase in D-dimer, the odds of thrombosis increased by 70% (95% confidence interval, 20%-150%, P = .004), after adjustment for age and sex (AUC 0.96, 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.00). There was a slight but significant improvement in model performance after adding FIBTEM maximum clot formation and EXTEM clot formation time to D-dimer in a multivariable model (P = .04).
Conclusions: D-dimer concentrations were more predictive of thrombosis in our patient population than any other parameter. Rotational thromboelastometry confirmed the hypercoagulable state of coronavirus disease 2019 intensive care unit patients. FIBTEM maximum clot formation and EXTEM clot formation time increased the predictability for thrombosis compared with only using D-dimer. Rotational thromboelastometry analysis is most useful in augmenting the information provided by the D-dimer concentration for venous thromboembolism risk assessment when the D-dimer concentration is between 1,625 and 6,900 ng/dL, but the enhancement is modest. Fibrinolysis shutdown did not correlate with thrombosis.