• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Sustain Cities Soc . Comparison of COVID-19 infection risks through aerosol transmission in supermarkets and small shops

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Sustain Cities Soc


. 2022 Jan;76:103424.
doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103424. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
Comparison of COVID-19 infection risks through aerosol transmission in supermarkets and small shops


Chunying Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Haida Tang[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Aerosol transmission is academically recognized as possible transmission route of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We established an approach to assess the airborne-disease infection risks through aerosol transmission based on the dose-response model and aerosol transport model. The accuracy of evaluation was guaranteed with on-site surveyed ventilation rate and occupant behavior. With the proposed approach, COVID-19 infection risks in 5 typical supermarkets and 21 small shops were evaluated. With one original infected early-shift staff, the average aerosols concentrations at steady-state are 1.06 × 10[SUP]-3[/SUP] RNA copies/m[SUP]3[/SUP] in the supermarkets and 4.73 × 10[SUP]-2[/SUP] RNA copies/m[SUP]3[/SUP] in the small shops. With the assumption of 5% original infected staff in the retail buildings, the infection probability of one customer is 1.40 × 10[SUP]-6[/SUP] for visiting one small shop and 6.22 × 10[SUP]-6[/SUP] for visiting one supermarket. The averaged infection risk in the supermarkets is higher than the small shops (p-value<0.001). On the other hand, the infection risks are higher for the staff working with the infected staff compared with the customers. The proposed approach can be applied to other occupied buildings and assist the pandemic control policy making for sustainable cities and society.

Keywords: COVID-19; infection risk; public health; quantitative microbial risk assessment; retail building.
 
Back
Top Bottom