• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The 2009 influenza pandemic: a review of the strengths and weaknesses of the health sector response in New Zealand

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
N Z Med J. 2012 Nov 9;125(1365):54-66.
The 2009 influenza pandemic: a review of the strengths and weaknesses of the health sector response in New Zealand.
Wilson N, Summers JA, Baker MG.
Source

Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, PO Box 7343 Wellington South, New Zealand. nick.wilson@otago.ac.nz.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION:

To inform future pandemic planning and disaster response, we aimed to review the literature on the health sector response to the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 pandemic in New Zealand in 2009.
METHODS:

We searched PubMed and Google Scholar along with the websites of government agencies for the period 1 April 2009 to 20 May 2012.
RESULTS:

In 2009, 18% of the New Zealand population had evidence of infection from the pandemic strain, 1122 people were hospitalised (with pandemic influenza as the primary diagnosis), 102 of those hospitalised were treated in intensive care units (ICU), and there were an estimated 49 pandemic-attributed deaths. At the severe end of the disease spectrum (ICU admissions and mortality), the health burden was significantly worse for Maori and Pacific peoples. The available evidence (including various estimates of low case-fatality risk relative to other high income countries), is consistent with the overall response in the public health, primary care and hospital sectors being fairly successful. Nevertheless, a number of likely weaknesses were identified, including a relative lack of: (i) a detailed review of the epidemiology and health sector response; (ii) sophisticated analytic studies to identify risk factors (e.g., using case-control studies); (iii) studies on pandemic vaccine uptake and public acceptability; and (iv) evaluation of the health protection messages that were used in campaigns and in media releases from health authorities.
CONCLUSIONS:

There appear to have been both strengths and weakness in the New Zealand health sector's response to the 2009 influenza pandemic. Nevertheless, it is probably still worthwhile to address some of the omissions to inform future pandemic and natural disaster planning and preparations.

PMID:
23254501
[PubMed - in process]

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23254501
 
Back
Top Bottom