• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomi

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Trials. 2017 Feb 10;18(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8.
[h=1]The immune response to 6-monthly versus annual standard dose inactivated trivalent influenza vaccination in older people: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial.[/h] Young B[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Sadarangani S[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Yew HS[SUP]3[/SUP], Yung CF[SUP]5[/SUP], Leo YS[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4,[/SUP][SUP]6[/SUP], Chen MI[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]6[/SUP], Wilder-Smith A[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] The seasonal influenza vaccine is less effective in older people and a single dose is unlikely to provide the year-round protection necessary for tropical climates which have year-round influenza virus activity. This study aims to assess the effect of a trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV3) booster at 180 days on haemagglutination-inhibition (HI) antibody titres for each of the influenza strains present in the administered vaccine in older people aged 65 years or above in Singapore.
[h=4]METHODS/DESIGN:[/h] This is a single-centre, randomised, observer-blind, active-comparator controlled, parallel-group, phase IV trial in 200 adults aged 65 years or older. Study participants will be assigned to one of two groups in a 1:1 ratio and followed for 1 year, with five scheduled visits. The control group will receive IIV3 at day 1, and an active comparator (Tetanus-diphtheria-pertussis vaccine) at day 180. Participants in the experimental group will receive IIV3 containing the same strains at day 1 and day 180. Endpoints are immunological, and include measures of HI titres, microneutralisation titres (MN) and cell-mediated immunity from first vaccination up to day 360.
[h=4]DISCUSSION:[/h] If superiority of 6-monthly influenza vaccination is demonstrated, this study could form the basis for a larger clinical trial with influenza infection as the primary endpoint.
[h=4]TRIAL REGISTRATION:[/h] ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02655874 . Registered on 12 January 2016.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Antibody persistence; Haemagglutination inhibition; Influenza; Older people; Tropics; Vaccine

PMID: 28183326 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1808-8
[PubMed - in process]
 
Back
Top Bottom