• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

The Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfection in Persons With Naturally Acquired Immunity With and Without Subsequent Receipt of a Single Dose of BNT162b2 V

Mary Wilson

Well-known member
A Retrospective Cohort Study

15 February 2022

https://doi.org/10.7326/M21-4130

Sivan Gazit, MD, MA, Roei Shlezinger, BA, Galit Perez, MN, MA, Roni Lotan, PhD, Asaf Peretz, MD, Amir Ben-Tov, MD, Esma Herzel, MSc, Hillel Alapi, BA, Dani Cohen, PhD, Khitam Muhsen, PhD, Gabriel Chodick, PhD, MHA, Tal Patalon, MD

Background:
There is insufficient evidence regarding the magnitude and durability of protection conferred by a combined effect of naturally acquired immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine-induced immunity.

Objective:
To compare the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in previously infected persons to that of previously infected persons who subsequently received a single dose of BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine.

Design:
A retrospective cohort study emulating a randomized controlled target trial through a series of nested trials.

Setting:
Nationally centralized database of Maccabi Healthcare Services, Israel.

Participants:
Persons with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection who did not receive subsequent SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were compared with persons with documented SARS-CoV-2 infection who received a single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine at least 3 months after infection.

Intervention:
Forty-one randomized controlled trials were emulated, in which 107 413 Maccabi Healthcare Services' members aged 16 years and older were eligible for at least 1 trial.

Measurements:
SARS-CoV-2–related outcomes of infection, symptomatic disease, hospitalization, and death, between 2 March and 13 December 2021.

Results:
A statistically significant decreased risk (hazard ratio, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.20]) for reinfection was found among persons who were previously infected and then vaccinated versus those who were previously infected but remained unvaccinated. In addition, there was a decreased risk for symptomatic disease (hazard ratio, 0.24 [CI, 0.20 to 0.29]) among previously infected and vaccinated persons compared with those who were not vaccinated after infection. No COVID-19–related mortality cases were found.

Limitation:
Hybrid protection against non-Delta variants could not be inferred.

Conclusion:
Persons previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 gained additional protection against reinfection and COVID-19 from a subsequent single dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine. Nonetheless, even without a subsequent vaccination, reinfection appeared relatively rare.
...
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M21-4130#.YgraJ07pBXI.twitter
 
Back
Top Bottom