• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Trivalent and quadrivalent influenza vaccination effectiveness in Australia and South Africa: results from a modelling study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2015 Dec 12. doi: 10.1111/irv.12367. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Trivalent and quadrivalent influenza vaccination effectiveness in Australia and South Africa: results from a modelling study.[/h] Milne GJ[SUP]1[/SUP], Halder N[SUP]1[/SUP], Kelso JK[SUP]1[/SUP], Barr IG[SUP]2[/SUP], Moyes J[SUP]3[/SUP], Kahn K[SUP]4[/SUP], Twine R[SUP]4[/SUP], Cohen C[SUP]3,[/SUP][SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] A modelling study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of trivalent (TIV) and quadrivalent (QIV) vaccination in South Africa and Australia.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] This study aimed to determine the potential benefits of alternative vaccination strategies which may depend on community-specific demographic and health characteristics.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] Two influenza A and two influenza B strains were simulated using individual-based simulation models representing specific communities in South Africa and Australia over 11 years. Scenarios using TIV or QIV, with alternative prioritisation strategies and vaccine coverage levels were evaluated using a country-specific health outcomes process.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] In South Africa, ~18% fewer deaths and hospitalisations would be expected to result from the use of QIV compared to TIV over the 11 modelled years (p = 0.031). In Australia, only 2% (p = 0.30) fewer deaths and hospitalisations would result. Vaccinating 2%, 5%, 15% or 20% of the population with TIV using a strategy of prioritising vulnerable age groups, including HIV-positive individuals, resulted in reductions in hospitalisations and mortality of at least 7%, 18%, 57% and 66% respectively, in both communities.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] The degree to which QIV can reduce health burden compared to TIV is strongly dependent on the number of years in which the influenza B lineage in the TIV matches the circulating B lineages. Assuming a moderate level of B cross-strain protection, TIV may be as effective as QIV. The choice of vaccination prioritisation has a greater impact than the QIV/TIV choice, with strategies targeting those most responsible for transmission being most effective. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Seasonal influenza; influenza vaccination; quadrivalent influenza vaccine

PMID: 26663701 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom