• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Trivalent and quadrivalent MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in young children: A dose- and schedule-finding study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.111 | How to Cite or Link Using DOI
Permissions & Reprints

Trivalent and quadrivalent MF59-adjuvanted influenza vaccine in young children: A dose- and schedule-finding study

Giovanni Della Cioppaa, b, c, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author, E-mail The Corresponding Author, Timo Vesikarid, Etienne Sokale, Kelly Linderta, b, c and Uwe Nicolaya, b, c

a Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Siena, Italy

b Novartis Vaccines Clinical Serology Laboratory, Marburg, Germany

c Novartis Pharmaceutical Development, Cambridge, MA, USA

d University of Tampere Medical School, Tampere, Finland

e Universit? Catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
Received 14 April 2011;
revised 20 August 2011;
accepted 25 August 2011.
Available online 8 September 2011.

Abstract

Young children are at increased risk for influenza infections and related complications. The protection offered to children by conventional trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines (TIV) is suboptimal, due to poor immunogenicity and a higher exposure to infection and complications in this age group, particularly from influenza B strains. In this dose-ranging, factorial design trial, we report the safety and immunogenicity of different combinations of adjuvanted (ATIV) and non-adjuvanted trivalent (TIV) and quadrivalent (QIV) influenza vaccines in 480 healthy children 6 to <36 months of age.

The results show the second B strain added to TIV was immunogenic and did not affect immunogenicity of the other strains. The addition of MF59-adjuvant promoted robust immune responses with notable elevations in antibodies observed even after one dose. A dose?response relationship was observed between the antibody response and MF59 adjuvant. No patterns in safety and tolerability emerged with different adjuvant and antigen doses nor with the addition of a second B strain. MF59-adjuvanted QIV offers potential advantages to young children.
Highlights

► This study confirms that the immunogenicity of nonadjuvanted influenza vaccines is suboptimal in 6?36 month-old children. ► Addition of MF59 adjuvant increased antibody responses to levels associated with protection in adults to an extent not achieved by nonadjuvanted vaccines and with no impact on reactogenicity and safety in these young children. ► A second influenza B strain combined with the traditional TIV vaccine is immunogenic and does not affect immunogenicity of the other three influenza strains. ► The MF59-adjuvanted TIV and QIV vaccines already show a meaningful immune response to influenza A strains after one dose, which may be beneficial in real-life clinical practice where a second dose is often missed, but the two-dose vaccination schedule must continue to be recommended in young children to provide protection against influenza B strains.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X11013880
 
Back
Top Bottom