• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Tulathromycin enhances humoral but not cellular immune response in pigs vaccinated against swine influenza

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Vet Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Dec 25. doi: 10.1111/jvp.12742. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Tulathromycin enhances humoral but not cellular immune response in pigs vaccinated against swine influenza.[/h] Pomorska-M?l M[SUP]1[/SUP], Kwit K[SUP]2[/SUP], Czyżewska-Dors E[SUP]2[/SUP], Pejsak Z[SUP]3[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] The effect of a standard, single dose therapy with tulathromycin was investigated on the postvaccinal humoral and cellular immune response in pigs vaccinated against swine influenza. Forty-five pigs, divided into 3 groups, were used (control not vaccinated (C, n = 15), control vaccinated (CV, n = 15), and experimentally received tulathromycin (TUL, n = 15)). For vaccination of pigs, an inactivated, commercial vaccine was used. Pigs from TUL group received single dose of tulathromycin intramuscularly, at the recommended dose (2.5 mg/kg body weight). Pigs from TUL and CV groups were vaccinated at 8 and 10 weeks of age. The specific humoral and cellular immune response against swine influenza virus (SIV) was evaluated. The results of present study showed that humoral postvaccinal response after vaccination against SIV can be modulated by treatment with tulathromycin. In pigs from TUL group, the significantly higher titers of anti-SIV-specific antibodies were observed 4 and 6 weeks after booster dose of vaccine. Simultaneously, T-cell-mediated immune response against SIV was not affected by tulathromycin. Our recent study confirmed the importance of defining the modulatory activity of tulathromycin because of its influence on the immune response to vaccines. Since the antibodies against hemagglutinin are crucial for the protection against SIV, the present observations should prompt further studies on the practical significance of recent results in terms of clinical implications (postvaccinal protection) in the field conditions.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] immune response; pigs; swine influenza; tulathromycin; vaccination

PMID: 30585339 DOI: 10.1111/jvp.12742
 
Back
Top Bottom