• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

UK - Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Chuck

Moderator
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jul/20/shut-schools-swine-flu


Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Slowing spread of virus would give more time to develop vaccine


* Denis Campbell and Polly Curtis
* guardian.co.uk, Monday 20 July 2009 21.45 BST
* Article history

Ministers were urged tonight to rethink their policy of keeping schools open through the swine flu pandemic after research showed that a shutdown would curb the spread of infection and limit the number of deaths.

As Andy Burnham, the health secretary, announced that a flu helpline to take the pressure off GPs' surgeries would go live this week, two infectious disease experts said school closures should be considered to reduce the number of cases and buy time until a vaccine is available.

Schools across Britain have now broken up for summer holidays, and experts hope this will help to slow the spread of the virus. But there are fears that when classes resume in the autumn the number of cases will increase rapidly.

School closures would cause serious difficulties for working parents, lead to a 1% loss in GDP through absenteeism and see as many as 30% of NHS staff having to take time off just when they are needed to treat growing numbers of patients.

In a study published in the today Lancet , Government adviser Professor Neil Ferguson and Dr Simon Cauchemez, both of the department of infectious disease epidemiology, Imperial College London, said "prolonged" closures could reduce the scale of the outbreak by 13-17% and at the pandemic's peak shutting schools could bring down the number of cases by 38-45%.

"It is therefore hoped that closure of schools during the pandemic might break the chains of transmission, with the following potential benefits: reducing the total number of cases; slowing the epidemic to give more time for vaccine production; and reducing the incidence of cases at the peak of the epidemic, limiting both the stress on healthcare systems and peak absenteeism in the general population, and thus increasing community-wide resilience," the researchers said.

Such a move would also raise the question of what should be done with millions of schoolchildren during a prolonged shutdown, they added. The authors said that governments in Europe and North America might have to take such a step after they studied the impact of school closures during flu epidemics in other countries stretching back to 1918.

They say that study of the 1918 flu outbreak in America and Australia indicates that shutting schools, in tandem with closing churches and improved hygiene, could have reduced the death toll by between 10% and 30%, and as much as 50% in some cities at the height of the outbreak.

About 100 schools closed after the start of the outbreak in May, but soon reopened when official advice changed because swine flu was becoming so prevalent.

Last night the schools department said it was sticking with the current guidance, which is not to close schools. Ed Balls, schools secretary, said: "Now that the virus is established in the community, expert advice is that there is no longer a strong case for closing schools to contain the spread of infection. We will be monitoring the situation closely over the school holidays and will review the evidence in late August."

The department's emergency planning group, Cerg, is now solely concerned with orchestrating schools' response to the spread of swine flu and updating ministers daily on the situation.

Professor Steve Field, chairman of the Royal College of General Practitioners, said ministers should keep open the possibility of school closures. "It's something that shouldn't be discounted if it's the height of the pandemic," he said. "It would depend on how the pandemic has developed. The Lancet study demonstrates that it would slow down the transmission of the virus and might cut down the number of people who get serious illness and who die."

Mick Brookes, general secretary of the National Association of Headteachers, called for a balanced view of the risks. "Even one person dying is a tragedy but if the mortality rate is the same of any other flu that needs to be kept in perspective," he said. "If more and more people become infected closures may well become inevitable. Younger children are more at risk so it might be right to close early years centres and nurseries first."

Martin Ward, deputy general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, said schools could set up internet-based classrooms if there were long-term school closures. "But with the best will in the world they are not going to make the progress they would have if they had been in school," he said.

Pregnant women may want to steer clear of crowded places in order to reduce their chances of catching the virus, the government's chief medical officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, said yesterday. The swine flu virus's current known level of risk meant that expectant mothers should not stop using public transport, going to work or attending events and family gatherings, he said. But he added: "Some mothers-to-be may wish to continue their day-to-day activities but exercise their choice now, on a highly precautionary basis, to avoid large densely populated gatherings where they have little control over personal contact."

He was trying to end the confusion over what steps pregnant women should take to avoid catching the virus after conflicting advice from medical organisations .
 
Re: UK - Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Where do they think these children will go if they are off school they will,hang around with there mates,and still go to shops with there parents.

our local town is full of groups of teenagers and school children hanging around with one another.
 
Re: UK - Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Where do they think these children will go if they are off school they will,hang around with there mates,and still go to shops with there parents.

our local town is full of groups of teenagers and school children hanging around with one another.

Surely they (and we) don't think that these children must infect other non-infected humans.

Sorry Vinny,
but I must say that infecting other persons/childrens because constricted to sit in the same rooms, is the oposite of infection control policy.

The ones who are not more teens, are submited to laws personaly, and could be quarantined forcibly if spreaders of an severe illness.

For the ones which remains in the child/teen group, I must said an maybe rude fact: they are on parents responsability.

The parents must ground them at home for several weeks if neccesary, until some vacc. came, or similar.

That's why an early closure/plain embargo/blanket was an extremely important thing to do in the early begining of this - and they don't want it.

So now, we all must swallow much more ugly things.

#1:
"As Andy Burnham, the health secretary, announced that a flu helpline to take the pressure off GPs' surgeries would go live this week, two infectious disease experts said school closures should be considered to reduce the number of cases and buy time until a vaccine is available."
:applause:
 
Re: UK - Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Sometimes though tropical, children can be a law unto themselves, and if the parents are not around, they sneak out to see there friends.if they cannot see them at school.i know i did when i was younger.
 
Re: UK - Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Vinny, true, so did I also. But not often. In those days, when I was found disobeying my parents, the punishment was great. Nowadays, parents who punish are rare. Now many children do what they want and parents raise their eyes to the sky and say they can't do anything with their kids. Still, parents should know that it's also a legal responsibility. In most countries, if your child disobeys and goes out, and makes an accident or catastrophe, the parents are liable in court. Perhaps parents should now be reminded of that responsibility.

It may mean some loss to society when schools close and parents may have to stay home and not work to keep their children inside. What is the greater cost to society? Some parents home to keep the children, or children at school who become sick and transmit the illness to many more parents than their own?
 
Re: UK - Shut schools to limit number of swine flu deaths, ministers told

Sometimes though tropical, children can be a law unto themselves, and if the parents are not around, they sneak out to see there friends.if they cannot see them at school.i know i did when i was younger.

I understand you Vinny (and others), but this is an potentialy deadly event.

The children must be awared of privately if not by the media/gov, and after they will listen mostly.

The teens, if explained enaugh with real facts the danger (not the actual TV media light explanations), will follow also, at least they will drasticaly deminish the roamings.

Finaly, if not everybody listen, it will be more good and lower spreadings, than now when they roaming freely worldwide and sit closely at schools, at the same time when we scientificaly know and see evidence, that they are the main first vectors of large outbreaks of pandemic flu in low afected zones.

It is worth to closed, and try.

If the society listen only the "bucks calculators", they will be in deep problems, as now all worldwide in only 3 months because of the early non-closures in Mex/US, etc., "advisors" who now are at large - no problems for such mega-spreading in a short time.

Forget the spin-doctors, go back to ancient wisdom of infection controls - no roamings and strict quarantines = much less potentialy serious infections, and much less social disruption.

Learning is not working - it can wait some time.

Working must be switched by gov in special mode during this pandemic vawes - to provide folks with elementary needs even if temporary closed - a kind of an several month "hollyday" - at home ...
 
Back
Top Bottom