tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
J Virol Methods. 2017 Aug 23. pii: S0166-0934(16)30464-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.014. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Use of M2e ELISAs for longitudinal surveillance of commercial poultry in Indonesia vaccinated against highly pathogenic avian influenza.[/h] Wibowo MH[SUP]1[/SUP], Tarigan S[SUP]2[/SUP], Sumarningsih[SUP]2[/SUP], Artanto S[SUP]3[/SUP], Indriani R[SUP]2[/SUP], Angoro D[SUP]3[/SUP], Putra CP[SUP]3[/SUP], Idris S[SUP]4[/SUP], Untari T[SUP]3[/SUP], Asmara W[SUP]3[/SUP], Tabbu CR[SUP]3[/SUP], Ignjatovic J[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] In countries where highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) H5N1 is endemic and controlled by vaccination, post-vaccination serological monitoring is essential to differentiate vaccinated poultry from those that are infected. The objectives of this study were to validate two experimental ELISAs that detect antibodies raised against the M2e protein of avian influenza virus that can be used for DIVA purposes. Results from the sM2e and tM2e ELISAs were compared with other conventional tests for the detection of H5N1influenza virus (virus isolation and RT-PCR) using samples collected from 16 commercial flocks in Indonesia. These comprised vaccinated layers aged between 18 and 68 weeks old that were sampled at ten-weekly intervals. A small number of sera were positive in sM2e and tM2e ELISA, 14 (0.6%) and 17 (0.7%) respectively, with low OD[SUB]420[/SUB] (0.1-0.3), but only 4 sera were positive in both tests. At the flock level, the incidence of M2e positive sera was low (4%), well below previously established minimum of 40% for an HPAIV H5N1-infected flock. Conventional M and H5 gene RT-PCRs indicated that none of 16 flocks were infected at any time during the study. No virus was isolated from any of the 480 pooled swab samples, except from one, for which the combined data analysis suggest to be the result of a laboratory cross-contamination. Clinical disease, mortalities or reduction in production performance, indicative of field H5N1 challenge, were not observed either in any of the flocks. Birds from two surveyed flocks, challenged in the laboratory with an Indonesian HPAIV H5N1 developed M2e antibodies in 50% and 55% of surviving birds with OD[SUB]420[/SUB] in the range of 0.35-1.47 in tM2e ELISA, confirming the validity of the criteria established for use of M2e ELISA for DIVA purposes. Overall these results showed that the tM2e ELISA could be a useful monitoring tool to ascertain freedom from H5N1 infections in vaccinated commercial poultry.
Copyright ? 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Avian influenza; Indonesia; M2e DIVA; Surveillance of H5N1 vaccinated poultry
PMID: 28843786 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.014
[h=1]Use of M2e ELISAs for longitudinal surveillance of commercial poultry in Indonesia vaccinated against highly pathogenic avian influenza.[/h] Wibowo MH[SUP]1[/SUP], Tarigan S[SUP]2[/SUP], Sumarningsih[SUP]2[/SUP], Artanto S[SUP]3[/SUP], Indriani R[SUP]2[/SUP], Angoro D[SUP]3[/SUP], Putra CP[SUP]3[/SUP], Idris S[SUP]4[/SUP], Untari T[SUP]3[/SUP], Asmara W[SUP]3[/SUP], Tabbu CR[SUP]3[/SUP], Ignjatovic J[SUP]5[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]
[h=3]Abstract[/h] In countries where highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) H5N1 is endemic and controlled by vaccination, post-vaccination serological monitoring is essential to differentiate vaccinated poultry from those that are infected. The objectives of this study were to validate two experimental ELISAs that detect antibodies raised against the M2e protein of avian influenza virus that can be used for DIVA purposes. Results from the sM2e and tM2e ELISAs were compared with other conventional tests for the detection of H5N1influenza virus (virus isolation and RT-PCR) using samples collected from 16 commercial flocks in Indonesia. These comprised vaccinated layers aged between 18 and 68 weeks old that were sampled at ten-weekly intervals. A small number of sera were positive in sM2e and tM2e ELISA, 14 (0.6%) and 17 (0.7%) respectively, with low OD[SUB]420[/SUB] (0.1-0.3), but only 4 sera were positive in both tests. At the flock level, the incidence of M2e positive sera was low (4%), well below previously established minimum of 40% for an HPAIV H5N1-infected flock. Conventional M and H5 gene RT-PCRs indicated that none of 16 flocks were infected at any time during the study. No virus was isolated from any of the 480 pooled swab samples, except from one, for which the combined data analysis suggest to be the result of a laboratory cross-contamination. Clinical disease, mortalities or reduction in production performance, indicative of field H5N1 challenge, were not observed either in any of the flocks. Birds from two surveyed flocks, challenged in the laboratory with an Indonesian HPAIV H5N1 developed M2e antibodies in 50% and 55% of surviving birds with OD[SUB]420[/SUB] in the range of 0.35-1.47 in tM2e ELISA, confirming the validity of the criteria established for use of M2e ELISA for DIVA purposes. Overall these results showed that the tM2e ELISA could be a useful monitoring tool to ascertain freedom from H5N1 infections in vaccinated commercial poultry.
Copyright ? 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] Avian influenza; Indonesia; M2e DIVA; Surveillance of H5N1 vaccinated poultry
PMID: 28843786 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.08.014