• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccination in pregnancy: Attitudes of nurses, midwives and health visitors in England

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Oct 19:0. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1382789. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Vaccination in pregnancy: Attitudes of nurses, midwives and health visitors in England.[/h] Vishram B[SUP]1[/SUP], Letley L[SUP]1[/SUP], Jan Van Hoek A[SUP]2[/SUP], Silverton L[SUP]3[/SUP], Donovan H[SUP]4[/SUP], Adams C[SUP]5[/SUP], Green D[SUP]1[/SUP], Edwards A[SUP]1[/SUP], Yarwood J[SUP]1[/SUP], Bedford H[SUP]6[/SUP], Amirthalingam G[SUP]1[/SUP], Campbell H[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVE:[/h] To examine amongst healthcare professionals in England; knowledge of vaccinations in pregnancy, their perceived roles in these programmes and whether they recommend scheduled vaccines to pregnant women.
[h=4]DESIGN:[/h] Cross sectional survey (online questionnaire) Setting: Healthcare workers in contact with pregnant women in England.
[h=4]PARTICIPANTS:[/h] The survey analysis included 3441 healthcare workers who had been surveyed during May to August 2015. The participants were midwives, practice nurses and health visitors, working in England who were members of the Royal College of Midwives, Royal College of Nursing and the Institute of Health Visiting.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] We found that knowledge of vaccination in pregnancy was high in all professional groups. Seventy three percent of all respondents would recommend the influenza vaccine and 74% would recommend the pertussis vaccine to pregnant women. They were more likely to recommend vaccination in pregnancy if they made positive vaccination choices themselves. Practice nurses were significantly more likely to recommend the pertussis and influenza vaccines to pregnant women than midwives and health visitors. Health professionals who had received immunisation training were more confident in giving advice to pregnant women.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] Immunisation training is essential if healthcare workers are to be informed and confident in effectively delivering the maternal immunisation programme and thus improving uptake of vaccines in pregnancy. These findings are important in tailoring educational programmes and addressing the training needs of different healthcare professional groups.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] attitudes; health visitors; midwives; nurses; pregnant; vaccination

PMID: 29048989 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1382789
 
Back
Top Bottom