tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine
. 2024 Mar 25:S0264-410X(24)00339-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.052. Online ahead of print. Influenza vaccination accuracy among adults: Self-report compared with electronic health record data
Matthew F Daley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Liza M Reifler[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jo Ann Shoup[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jason M Glanz[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bruno J Lewin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nicola P Klein[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Elyse O Kharbanda[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Huong Q McLean[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Simon J Hambidge[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Jennifer C Nelson[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Allison L Naleway[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Eric S Weintraub[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Michael M McNeil[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Hilda Razzaghi[SUP] 14 [/SUP], James A Singleton[SUP] 15 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Objective: To assess the validity of electronic health record (EHR)-based influenza vaccination data among adults in a multistate network.
Methods: Following the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons, surveys were conducted among a random sample of adults who did or did not appear influenza-vaccinated (per EHR data) during the influenza season. Participants were asked to report their influenza vaccination status; self-report was treated as the criterion standard. Results were combined across survey years.
Results: Survey response rate was 44.7% (777 of 1740) for the 2018-2019 influenza season and 40.5% (505 of 1246) for the 2019-2020 influenza season. The sensitivity of EHR-based influenza vaccination data was 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.1, 81.1), specificity 98.4% (95% CI 92.9, 99.9), and negative predictive value 73.9% (95% CI 68.0, 79.3).
Conclusions: In a multistate research network across two recent influenza seasons, there was moderate concordance between EHR-based vaccination data and self-report.
Keywords: Accuracy; Adults; Electronic health records; Influenza vaccination; Self-report.
. 2024 Mar 25:S0264-410X(24)00339-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.052. Online ahead of print. Influenza vaccination accuracy among adults: Self-report compared with electronic health record data
Matthew F Daley[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Liza M Reifler[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jo Ann Shoup[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jason M Glanz[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Bruno J Lewin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nicola P Klein[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Elyse O Kharbanda[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Huong Q McLean[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Simon J Hambidge[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Jennifer C Nelson[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Allison L Naleway[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Eric S Weintraub[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Michael M McNeil[SUP] 13 [/SUP], Hilda Razzaghi[SUP] 14 [/SUP], James A Singleton[SUP] 15 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 38531726
- DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.03.052
Objective: To assess the validity of electronic health record (EHR)-based influenza vaccination data among adults in a multistate network.
Methods: Following the 2018-2019 and 2019-2020 influenza seasons, surveys were conducted among a random sample of adults who did or did not appear influenza-vaccinated (per EHR data) during the influenza season. Participants were asked to report their influenza vaccination status; self-report was treated as the criterion standard. Results were combined across survey years.
Results: Survey response rate was 44.7% (777 of 1740) for the 2018-2019 influenza season and 40.5% (505 of 1246) for the 2019-2020 influenza season. The sensitivity of EHR-based influenza vaccination data was 75.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 68.1, 81.1), specificity 98.4% (95% CI 92.9, 99.9), and negative predictive value 73.9% (95% CI 68.0, 79.3).
Conclusions: In a multistate research network across two recent influenza seasons, there was moderate concordance between EHR-based vaccination data and self-report.
Keywords: Accuracy; Adults; Electronic health records; Influenza vaccination; Self-report.