• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: A randomised, compara

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2024 Nov 29:44:126542.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126542. Online ahead of print. Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing SARS-CoV-2 spike: A randomised, comparator-controlled, phase 2 trial

Vu Dinh Thiem[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dang Duc Anh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vu Hai Ha[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nguyen Van Thom[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Tran Cong Thang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Jose Mateus[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Juan Manuel Carreño[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Rama Raghunandan[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Nguyen Mai Huong[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Laina D Mercer[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Jorge Flores[SUP] 7 [/SUP], E Alexandar Escarrega[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ariel Raskin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Duong Huu Thai[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Le Van Be[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Alessandro Sette[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Bruce L Innis[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Florian Krammer[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Daniela Weiskopf[SUP] 11 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Production of affordable coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines in low- and lower-middle-income countries is needed. NDV-HXP-S is an inactivated egg-based recombinant Newcastle disease virus vaccine expressing the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A public sector manufacturer in Vietnam assessed the immunogenicity of NDV-HXP-S (COVIVAC) relative to an authorized vaccine. This phase 2 stage of a randomised, observer-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial was conducted at three community health centers in Thai Binh Province, Vietnam. Healthy males and non-pregnant females, 18 years of age and older, were eligible. Participants were randomised by age (18-59, ≥60 years) to receive one of three treatments by intramuscular injection twice, 28 days apart: COVIVAC at 3 μg or 6 μg, or AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine VAXZEVRIA™. Participants and personnel assessing outcomes were masked to treatment. The vaccine dose was selected based on Phase 1 results. A 6 μg dose was chosen to explore the immunogenicity gain over the 3-μg dose. The study's aim is to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of COVIVAC at two dose levels compared to VAXZEVRIA, the most commonly used COVID-19 vaccine in Vietnam. The main outcome was the induction of 50% neutralising antibody titers against vaccine-homologous pseudotyped virus 14 days (day 43) and 6 months (day 197) after the second vaccination by age group. The primary immunogenicity and safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of the vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194. During August 10-23, 2021, 737 individuals were screened, and 374 were randomised (124-125 per group); all subjects received vaccine dose one and all but three received doses two four weeks later. Subjects 18-59 years of age achieved the following geometric mean titers of PNA 14 days after vaccine dose two: 153⋅28 (95 % CI 124·2-189⋅15) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 176⋅2 (95 % CI 141⋅45-220.27) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 99⋅92(95 % CI 80.80-123⋅56) for VAXZEVRIA. Subjects ≥60 years of age also achieved potent geometric mean titers of PNA at the same timepoint: 183⋅57 (95 % CI 133.4-252⋅61) for COVIVAC 3 μg, 257⋅87 (95 % CI 181⋅6-367⋅18) for COVIVAC 6 μg, and 79⋅49(95 % CI 55⋅68-113⋅4) for VAXZEVRIA. On day 43, the geometric mean fold rise of 50 % neutralising antibody titers for subjects age 18-59 years was 31·20 (COVIVAC 3 μg N = 82, 95 % CI 25·14-38·74), 35·80 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 83, 95 % CI 29·03-44·15), 18·85 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 82, 95 % CI 15·10-23·54), and for subjects age ≥ 60 years was 37·27 (COVIVAC 3 μg; N = 42, 95 % CI 27·43-50·63), 50·10 (COVIVAC 6 μg; N = 40, 95 % CI 35·46-70·76), 16·11 (VAXZEVRIA; N = 40, 95 % CI 11·73-22·13). Among subjects seronegative for anti-S IgG at baseline, the day 43 geometric mean titer ratio of neutralising antibody (COVIVC 6 μg/VAXZEVRIA) was 1·77 (95 % CI 1·30-2·40) for subjects age 18-59 years and 3·24 (95 % CI 1·98-5·32) for subjects age ≥ 60 years. On day 197, the age-specific ratios were 1·11 (95 % CI 0·51-2·43) and 2·32 (0·69-7·85). Vaccines were well tolerated; reactogenicity was predominantly mild and transient. The percentage of subjects with unsolicited adverse events (AEs) during 28 days after vaccinations was similar among treatments (COVIVAC 3 μg 29·0 %, COVIVAC 6 μg 23·2 %, VAXZEVRIA 31·2 %); no vaccine-related AE was reported. Considering that induction of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 has been correlated with the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, including VAXZEVRIA, our results suggest that vaccination with COVIVAC may afford clinical benefit matching or exceeding that of the VAXZEVRIA vaccine. ClinicalTrials.govNCT05940194.


 
Back
Top Bottom