• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccines (Basel) . A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination of Health Workers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)


. 2021 Sep 29;9(10):1104.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9101104.
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Seasonal Influenza Vaccination of Health Workers


Tingting Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Xiaoling Qi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Qin Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Wenge Tang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kun Su[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mengmeng Jia[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Weizhong Yang[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yu Xia[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yu Xiong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Li Qi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luzhao Feng[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the pooled effect of influenza vaccinations for health workers (HWs). Nine databases were screened to identify randomized clinical trials and comparative observational studies that reported the effect of influenza vaccination among HWs. The risk ratio (RR), standardized mean difference, and 95% confidence interval (CI) were employed to study the effect size using fixed/random-effect models. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses were conducted accordingly. Publication bias was examined. Sixteen studies (involving 7971 HWs from nine countries) were included after a comprehensive literature search. The combined RR regarding the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.25 to 0.54), the incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI) was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.45 to 1.06), the absenteeism rate was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.46 to 0.86), and the integrated standardized mean difference of workdays lost was -0.18 (95% CI: -0.28 to -0.07) days/person. The subgroup analysis indicated that vaccination significantly decreases the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza in different countries, study populations, and average-age vaccinated groups. Influenza vaccinations could effectively reduce the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza, absenteeism rates, and workdays lost among HWs. It is advisable, therefore, to improve the coverage and increase the influenza vaccination count among HWs, which may benefit both workers and medical institutions.

Keywords: absenteeism rate; health workers; incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza; influenza vaccination; meta-analysis.
 
Back
Top Bottom