tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)
. 2020 Oct 12;8(4):E600.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040600.
Promoting Influenza Vaccination among Staff of Nursing Homes According to Behavioral Insights: Analyzing the Choice Architecture during a Nudge-Based Intervention
Chiara Lorini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Francesca Ierardi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Claudia Gatteschi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giacomo Galletti[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Francesca Collini[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Laura Peracca[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Patrizio Zanobini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fabrizio Gemmi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Guglielmo Bonaccorsi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
(1) Background: Influenza vaccination uptake in nursing home (NH) workers is uncommon. The aim of this study was to understand the choice architecture of influenza vaccination acceptance or refusal among them and to promote vaccination acceptance using the nudge approach. (2) Methods: In autumn 2019, a nudge intervention with a contextual qualitative analysis of choice architecture of vaccination was performed among the staff of eight Tuscan NHs. In summer 2020, a cross-sectional study including the staff of 111 NHs (8 in the nudge, 103 in the comparison group) was conducted to assess the impact of the nudge intervention in promoting vaccination uptake. (3) Results: Macro-categories of motivations for vaccination uptake that emerged from the qualitative analysis were risk perception, value dimension, and trust, while those regarding refusal were risk perception, distrust, value dimension, and reasons related to one's health. Considering the cross-sectional study, influenza vaccination uptake in the 2018-2019 season was similar in the two groups (23.6% vs. 22.2% respectively, in the nudge and comparison group), but significantly different in the 2019-2020 season: 28% in the nudge vs. 20% in the comparison group. Also, the intention to get the vaccine in the 2020-2021 season was significantly different in the two groups: 37.9% in the nudge and 30.8% in the comparison group. (4) Conclusions: Nudge interventions-simple, fast, low cost-could be effective in promoting vaccination acceptance among NH workers and the analysis of choice architecture could be useful in improving tailored, new nudge interventions aimed at modifying irrational biased and cognitive errors.
Keywords: choice architecture; influenza vaccination; nudge; nursing home; staff.
. 2020 Oct 12;8(4):E600.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines8040600.
Promoting Influenza Vaccination among Staff of Nursing Homes According to Behavioral Insights: Analyzing the Choice Architecture during a Nudge-Based Intervention
Chiara Lorini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Francesca Ierardi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Claudia Gatteschi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Giacomo Galletti[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Francesca Collini[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Laura Peracca[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Patrizio Zanobini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fabrizio Gemmi[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Guglielmo Bonaccorsi[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33053868
- DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040600
Abstract
(1) Background: Influenza vaccination uptake in nursing home (NH) workers is uncommon. The aim of this study was to understand the choice architecture of influenza vaccination acceptance or refusal among them and to promote vaccination acceptance using the nudge approach. (2) Methods: In autumn 2019, a nudge intervention with a contextual qualitative analysis of choice architecture of vaccination was performed among the staff of eight Tuscan NHs. In summer 2020, a cross-sectional study including the staff of 111 NHs (8 in the nudge, 103 in the comparison group) was conducted to assess the impact of the nudge intervention in promoting vaccination uptake. (3) Results: Macro-categories of motivations for vaccination uptake that emerged from the qualitative analysis were risk perception, value dimension, and trust, while those regarding refusal were risk perception, distrust, value dimension, and reasons related to one's health. Considering the cross-sectional study, influenza vaccination uptake in the 2018-2019 season was similar in the two groups (23.6% vs. 22.2% respectively, in the nudge and comparison group), but significantly different in the 2019-2020 season: 28% in the nudge vs. 20% in the comparison group. Also, the intention to get the vaccine in the 2020-2021 season was significantly different in the two groups: 37.9% in the nudge and 30.8% in the comparison group. (4) Conclusions: Nudge interventions-simple, fast, low cost-could be effective in promoting vaccination acceptance among NH workers and the analysis of choice architecture could be useful in improving tailored, new nudge interventions aimed at modifying irrational biased and cognitive errors.
Keywords: choice architecture; influenza vaccination; nudge; nursing home; staff.