tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 Nov;7 Suppl 3:8-17. doi: 10.1111/irv.12178.
Ventilatory strategies and supportive care in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Luks AM.
Source
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and the International Respiratory and Severe Illness Center (INTERSECT), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
While antiviral therapy is an important component of care in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following influenza infection, it is not sufficient to ensure good outcomes, and additional measures are usually necessary. Patients usually receive high levels of supplemental oxygen to counteract the hypoxemia resulting from severe gas exchange abnormalities. Many patients also receive invasive mechanical ventilation for support for oxygenation, while in resource-poor settings, supplemental oxygen via face mask may be the only available intervention. Patients with ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation should receive lung-protective ventilation, whereby tidal volume is decreased to 6 ml/kg of their predicted weight and distending pressures are maintained ≤30 cm H2 O, as well as increased inspired oxygen concentrations and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent atelectasis and support oxygenation. While these measures are sufficient in most patients, a minority develop refractory hypoxemia and may receive additional therapies, including prone positioning, inhaled vasodilators, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, recruitment maneuvers followed by high PEEP, and neuromuscular blockade, although recent data suggest that this last option may be warranted earlier in the clinical course before development of refractory hypoxemia. Application of these "rescue strategies" is complicated by the lack of guidance in the literature regarding implementation. While much attention is devoted to these strategies, clinicians must not lose sight of simple interventions that affect patient outcomes including head of bed elevation, prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal bleeding, judicious use of fluids in the post-resuscitative phase, and a protocol-based approach to sedation and spontaneous breathing trials.
? 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
KEYWORDS:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxemia, influenza, mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure
PMID:
24215377
[PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215377
Ventilatory strategies and supportive care in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Luks AM.
Source
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine and the International Respiratory and Severe Illness Center (INTERSECT), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
While antiviral therapy is an important component of care in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) following influenza infection, it is not sufficient to ensure good outcomes, and additional measures are usually necessary. Patients usually receive high levels of supplemental oxygen to counteract the hypoxemia resulting from severe gas exchange abnormalities. Many patients also receive invasive mechanical ventilation for support for oxygenation, while in resource-poor settings, supplemental oxygen via face mask may be the only available intervention. Patients with ARDS receiving mechanical ventilation should receive lung-protective ventilation, whereby tidal volume is decreased to 6 ml/kg of their predicted weight and distending pressures are maintained ≤30 cm H2 O, as well as increased inspired oxygen concentrations and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) to prevent atelectasis and support oxygenation. While these measures are sufficient in most patients, a minority develop refractory hypoxemia and may receive additional therapies, including prone positioning, inhaled vasodilators, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, recruitment maneuvers followed by high PEEP, and neuromuscular blockade, although recent data suggest that this last option may be warranted earlier in the clinical course before development of refractory hypoxemia. Application of these "rescue strategies" is complicated by the lack of guidance in the literature regarding implementation. While much attention is devoted to these strategies, clinicians must not lose sight of simple interventions that affect patient outcomes including head of bed elevation, prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism and gastrointestinal bleeding, judicious use of fluids in the post-resuscitative phase, and a protocol-based approach to sedation and spontaneous breathing trials.
? 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
KEYWORDS:
Acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxemia, influenza, mechanical ventilation, respiratory failure
PMID:
24215377
[PubMed - in process]
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24215377