tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Vet World
. 2021 Oct;14(10):2803-2808.
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2803-2808. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Retrospective surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pets from Brazil
Otávio Valério de Carvalho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luiz Eduardo Ristow[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Davi Dos Santos Rodrigues[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cláudia Kathariny da Silva Farias[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rita de Cássia Carvalho Maia[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Background and aim: The emerging concerns regarding the new Coronavirus's ability to cause infection in pets has led to animal testing and worrisome findings reported all over the world in domesticated and wild animals. This study aimed to investigate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in dog and cat samples with the clinical presentation for respiratory or gastrointestinal disease in Brazil.
Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-five samples were collected from 12 states of Brazil that originated from the gastrointestinal, upper respiratory tract, and other sites, including some pools of samples from before the onset of the pandemic including blood and/or urine samples. They were tested for RT-PCR detection of respiratory or gastrointestinal pathogens through Respiratory or Diarrhea RT-PCR Panels in the TECSA (Tecnologia em Saninade Animal - Animal Health Technology) Veterinary Medicine Laboratory. This work was conducted in compliance with ethical standards.
Results: Seven different microorganisms that can cause respiratory and/or gastrointestinal clinical signs were detected in cats (Feline Coronavirus [FCoV], Feline Parvovirus, Feline Leukemia Virus, Feline Calicivirus, Mycoplasma felis, Campylobacter spp., and Cryptosporidium spp.) and three in dogs (canine distemper virus, Cryptosporidium spp., and Babesia spp.).
Conclusion: Although the samples corresponded to the beginning of coronavirus disease-19 spread in Brazil and clinically correlated with the expected viral replication sites, none of the animals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2; reassuringly, four cats tested positive or FCoV none of them were positive for SARS-CoV2. The epidemiological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in pets is considered a one health issue, important for monitoring the disease evolution, spread and minimizing the animal-human health impacts, and directing Public Health Policies.
Keywords: companion animals; coronavirus disease-19; vigilance; virus.
. 2021 Oct;14(10):2803-2808.
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2803-2808. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
Retrospective surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in pets from Brazil
Otávio Valério de Carvalho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Luiz Eduardo Ristow[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Davi Dos Santos Rodrigues[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cláudia Kathariny da Silva Farias[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Rita de Cássia Carvalho Maia[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34903942
- PMCID: PMC8654753
- DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.2803-2808
Abstract
Background and aim: The emerging concerns regarding the new Coronavirus's ability to cause infection in pets has led to animal testing and worrisome findings reported all over the world in domesticated and wild animals. This study aimed to investigate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in dog and cat samples with the clinical presentation for respiratory or gastrointestinal disease in Brazil.
Materials and methods: One hundred and twenty-five samples were collected from 12 states of Brazil that originated from the gastrointestinal, upper respiratory tract, and other sites, including some pools of samples from before the onset of the pandemic including blood and/or urine samples. They were tested for RT-PCR detection of respiratory or gastrointestinal pathogens through Respiratory or Diarrhea RT-PCR Panels in the TECSA (Tecnologia em Saninade Animal - Animal Health Technology) Veterinary Medicine Laboratory. This work was conducted in compliance with ethical standards.
Results: Seven different microorganisms that can cause respiratory and/or gastrointestinal clinical signs were detected in cats (Feline Coronavirus [FCoV], Feline Parvovirus, Feline Leukemia Virus, Feline Calicivirus, Mycoplasma felis, Campylobacter spp., and Cryptosporidium spp.) and three in dogs (canine distemper virus, Cryptosporidium spp., and Babesia spp.).
Conclusion: Although the samples corresponded to the beginning of coronavirus disease-19 spread in Brazil and clinically correlated with the expected viral replication sites, none of the animals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2; reassuringly, four cats tested positive or FCoV none of them were positive for SARS-CoV2. The epidemiological surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 in pets is considered a one health issue, important for monitoring the disease evolution, spread and minimizing the animal-human health impacts, and directing Public Health Policies.
Keywords: companion animals; coronavirus disease-19; vigilance; virus.