tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Virusdisease
. 2021 May 3;1-3.
doi: 10.1007/s13337-021-00692-5. Online ahead of print.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR test: factors influencing interpretation of results
Kiran Munne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Venkanna Bhanothu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vikrant Bhor[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Vainav Patel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Smita D Mahale[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Shailesh Pande[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
In this current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), prompt interventions in terms of early detection and clinical management along with isolation of positive cases is of utmost importance. This helps to limit not only the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections but also the morbidity and mortality associated with it. Different strategies for screening of COVID-19 in containment zones and non-containment areas include testing of symptomatic patients and their contacts in fever clinics, hospital-based testing, testing on demand and population-based screening. The choice of tests like reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), rapid antigen testing (RAT) or antibody test depends upon these strategies and also the turnaround time. Currently, RT-PCR is considered the gold standard for COVID-19 detection. This commentary provides the insights and experiences on COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR. The utility of this test is limited by several false positive, false negative and inconclusive results at early stages of infection, scarcity of reagents and lack of well-equipped labs including trained staff. Moreover, appropriate sample collection and transport, standard laboratory protocols, stringent quality control norms, good quality RNA extraction kits, PCR kits with suitable primers can help in improving accuracy of the test results. A careful assessment of clinical, radiological and molecular findings is required for identifying potential cases of COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; Laboratory diagnosis; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2.
. 2021 May 3;1-3.
doi: 10.1007/s13337-021-00692-5. Online ahead of print.
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-PCR test: factors influencing interpretation of results
Kiran Munne[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Venkanna Bhanothu[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vikrant Bhor[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Vainav Patel[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Smita D Mahale[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Shailesh Pande[SUP] 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 33969149
- PMCID: PMC8089129
- DOI: 10.1007/s13337-021-00692-5
Abstract
In this current pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), prompt interventions in terms of early detection and clinical management along with isolation of positive cases is of utmost importance. This helps to limit not only the spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections but also the morbidity and mortality associated with it. Different strategies for screening of COVID-19 in containment zones and non-containment areas include testing of symptomatic patients and their contacts in fever clinics, hospital-based testing, testing on demand and population-based screening. The choice of tests like reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), rapid antigen testing (RAT) or antibody test depends upon these strategies and also the turnaround time. Currently, RT-PCR is considered the gold standard for COVID-19 detection. This commentary provides the insights and experiences on COVID-19 diagnosis by RT-PCR. The utility of this test is limited by several false positive, false negative and inconclusive results at early stages of infection, scarcity of reagents and lack of well-equipped labs including trained staff. Moreover, appropriate sample collection and transport, standard laboratory protocols, stringent quality control norms, good quality RNA extraction kits, PCR kits with suitable primers can help in improving accuracy of the test results. A careful assessment of clinical, radiological and molecular findings is required for identifying potential cases of COVID-19.
Keywords: COVID-19; Laboratory diagnosis; RT-PCR; SARS-CoV-2.