• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Viruses . A Cross Sectional Sampling Reveals Novel Coronaviruses in Bat Populations of Georgia

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Viruses


. 2021 Dec 31;14(1):72.
doi: 10.3390/v14010072.
A Cross Sectional Sampling Reveals Novel Coronaviruses in Bat Populations of Georgia


Lela Urushadze[SUP] 1 [/SUP], George Babuadze[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Mang Shi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Luis E Escobar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Matthew R Mauldin[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Ioseb Natradeze[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ann Machablishvili[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tamar Kutateladze[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paata Imnadze[SUP] 1 7 [/SUP], Yoshinori Nakazawa[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Andres Velasco-Villa[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Mammal-associated coronaviruses have a long evolutionary history across global bat populations, which makes them prone to be the most likely ancestral origins of coronavirus-associated epidemics and pandemics globally. Limited coronavirus research has occurred at the junction of Europe and Asia, thereby investigations in Georgia are critical to complete the coronavirus diversity map in the region. We conducted a cross-sectional coronavirus survey in bat populations at eight locations of Georgia, from July to October of 2014. We tested 188 anal swab samples, remains of previous pathogen discovery studies, for the presence of coronaviruses using end-point pan-coronavirus RT-PCR assays. Samples positive for a 440 bp amplicon were Sanger sequenced to infer coronavirus subgenus or species through phylogenetic reconstructions. Overall, we found a 24.5% positive rate, with 10.1% for Alphacoronavirus and 14.4% for Betacoronavirus. Albeit R. euryale, R. ferrumequinum, M. blythii and M. emarginatus were found infected with both CoV genera, we could not rule out CoV co-infection due to limitation of the sequencing method used and sample availability. Based on phylogenetic inferences and genetic distances at nucleotide and amino acid levels, we found one putative new subgenus and three new species of Alphacoronavirus, and two new species of Betacoronavirus.

Keywords: alphacoronavirus; bats; betacoronavirus; coronavirus; eastern europe; georgia; phylogeny.
 
Back
Top Bottom