• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Viruses . Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a Zoo-Kept Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes)

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Viruses


. 2024 Mar 28;16(4):521.
doi: 10.3390/v16040521. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a Zoo-Kept Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes)

Tatjana Chan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Julia Ginders[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Evelyn Kuhlmeier[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Marina L Meli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eva Bönzli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Theres Meili[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Julia Hüttl[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jean-Michel Hatt[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Karin Hindenlang Clerc[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Anja Kipar[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Fabia Wyss[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Christian Wenker[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Cecilia Valenzuela Agüí[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Christian Urban[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Christian Beisel[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Tanja Stadler[SUP] 7 8 [/SUP], Regina Hofmann-Lehmann[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Many different animal species are susceptible to SARS-CoV-2, including a few Canidae (domestic dog and raccoon dog). So far, only experimental evidence is available concerning SARS-CoV-2 infections in red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). This is the first report of SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in a sample from a red fox. The RT-qPCR-positive fox was zoo-kept together with another fox and two bears in the Swiss Canton of Zurich. Combined material from a conjunctival and nasal swab collected for canine distemper virus diagnostics tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA with Ct values of 36.9 (E gene assay) and 35.7 (RdRp gene assay). The sample was analysed for SARS-CoV-2 within a research project testing residual routine diagnostic samples from different animal species submitted between spring 2020 and December 2022 to improve knowledge on SARS-CoV-2 infections within different animal species and investigate their potential role in a One Health context. Within this project, 246 samples from 153 different animals from Swiss zoos and other wild animal species all tested SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR and/or serologically negative so far, except for the reported fox. The source of SARS-CoV-2 in the fox is unknown. The fox disappeared within the naturally structured enclosure, and the cadaver was not found. No further control measures were undertaken.

Keywords: COVID-19; One Health; red fox; wild animal species; wildlife; zoo animals.

 
Back
Top Bottom