• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Viruses . Epidemiologic and Genomic Evidence for Zoonotic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among People and Animals on a Michigan Mink Farm, United States

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Viruses


. 2023 Dec 15;15(12):2436.
doi: 10.3390/v15122436. Epidemiologic and Genomic Evidence for Zoonotic Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among People and Animals on a Michigan Mink Farm, United States, 2020

Ria R Ghai[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anne Straily[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nora Wineland[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jennifer Calogero[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Mary Grace Stobierski[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kimberly Signs[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Melissa Blievernicht[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yaritbel Torres-Mendoza[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michelle A Waltenburg[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jillian A Condrey[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Heather M Blankenship[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Diana Riner[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nancy Barr[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michele Schalow[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jarold Goodrich[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Cheryl Collins[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ausaf Ahmad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], John Michael Metz[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Owen Herzegh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kelly Straka[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Dustin M Arsnoe[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Anthony G Duffiney[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Susan A Shriner[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Markus H Kainulainen[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ann Carpenter[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Florence Whitehill[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Natalie M Wendling[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Robyn A Stoddard[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adam C Retchless[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Anna Uehara[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ying Tao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Yan Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jing Zhang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Suxiang Tong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Casey Barton Behravesh[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Farmed mink are one of few animals in which infection with SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in sustained transmission among a population and spillback from mink to people. In September 2020, mink on a Michigan farm exhibited increased morbidity and mortality rates due to confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. We conducted an epidemiologic investigation to identify the source of initial mink exposure, assess the degree of spread within the facility's overall mink population, and evaluate the risk of further viral spread on the farm and in surrounding wildlife habitats. Three farm employees reported symptoms consistent with COVID-19 the same day that increased mortality rates were observed among the mink herd. One of these individuals, and another asymptomatic employee, tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR) 9 days later. All but one mink sampled on the farm were positive for SARS-CoV-2 based on nucleic acid detection from at least one oral, nasal, or rectal swab tested by RT-qPCR (99%). Sequence analysis showed high degrees of similarity between sequences from mink and the two positive farm employees. Epidemiologic and genomic data, including the presence of F486L and N501T mutations believed to arise through mink adaptation, support the hypothesis that the two employees with SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid detection contracted COVID-19 from mink. However, the specific source of virus introduction onto the farm was not identified. Three companion animals living with mink farm employees and 31 wild animals of six species sampled in the surrounding area were negative for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. Results from this investigation support the necessity of a One Health approach to manage the zoonotic spread of SARS-CoV-2 and underscores the critical need for multifaceted public health approaches to prevent the introduction and spread of respiratory viruses on mink farms.

Keywords: COVID-19; Neogale vison; One Health; SARS-CoV-2; animal; coronavirus; mink; zoonotic disease.

 
Back
Top Bottom