tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Viruses
. 2022 Jan 24;14(2):224.
doi: 10.3390/v14020224.
Time-Dependent Proinflammatory Responses Shape Virus Interference during Coinfections of Influenza A Virus and Influenza D Virus
Minhui Guan[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Sherry Blackmon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Alicia K Olivier[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Xiaojian Zhang[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Liyuan Liu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Amelia Woolums[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mark A Crenshaw[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Shengfa F Liao[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Richard Webby[SUP] 7 [/SUP], William Epperson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Xiu-Feng Wan[SUP] 1 2 3 4 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Both influenza A virus (IAV) and influenza D virus (IDV) are enzootic in pigs. IAV causes approximately 100% morbidity with low mortality, whereas IDV leads to only mild respiratory diseases in pigs. In this study, we performed a series of coinfection experiments in vitro and in vivo to understand how IAV and IDV interact and cause pathogenesis during coinfection. The results showed that IAV inhibited IDV replication when infecting swine tracheal epithelial cells (STECs) with IAV 24 or 48 h prior to IDV inoculation and that IDV suppressed IAV replication when IDV preceded IAV inoculation by 48 h. Virus interference was not identified during simultaneous IAV/IDV infections or with 6 h between the two viral infections, regardless of their order. The interference pattern at 24 and 48 h correlated with proinflammatory responses induced by the first infection, which, for IDV, was slower than for IAV by about 24 h. The viruses did not interfere with each other if both infected the cells before proinflammatory responses were induced. Coinfection in pigs further demonstrated that IAV interfered with both viral shedding and virus replication of IDV, especially in the upper respiratory tract. Clinically, coinfection of IDV and IAV did not show significant enhancement of disease pathogenesis, compared with the pigs infected with IAV alone. In summary, this study suggests that interference during coinfection of IAV and IDV is primarily due to the proinflammatory response; therefore, it is dependent on the time between infections and the order of infection. This study facilitates our understanding of virus epidemiology and pathogenesis associated with IAV and IDV coinfection.
Keywords: co-infection; influenza A virus; influenza D virus; proinflammatory response; swine; viral interference.
. 2022 Jan 24;14(2):224.
doi: 10.3390/v14020224.
Time-Dependent Proinflammatory Responses Shape Virus Interference during Coinfections of Influenza A Virus and Influenza D Virus
Minhui Guan[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Sherry Blackmon[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Alicia K Olivier[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Xiaojian Zhang[SUP] 1 2 3 [/SUP], Liyuan Liu[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Amelia Woolums[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Mark A Crenshaw[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Shengfa F Liao[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Richard Webby[SUP] 7 [/SUP], William Epperson[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Xiu-Feng Wan[SUP] 1 2 3 4 8 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35215819
- PMCID: PMC8878573
- DOI: 10.3390/v14020224
Abstract
Both influenza A virus (IAV) and influenza D virus (IDV) are enzootic in pigs. IAV causes approximately 100% morbidity with low mortality, whereas IDV leads to only mild respiratory diseases in pigs. In this study, we performed a series of coinfection experiments in vitro and in vivo to understand how IAV and IDV interact and cause pathogenesis during coinfection. The results showed that IAV inhibited IDV replication when infecting swine tracheal epithelial cells (STECs) with IAV 24 or 48 h prior to IDV inoculation and that IDV suppressed IAV replication when IDV preceded IAV inoculation by 48 h. Virus interference was not identified during simultaneous IAV/IDV infections or with 6 h between the two viral infections, regardless of their order. The interference pattern at 24 and 48 h correlated with proinflammatory responses induced by the first infection, which, for IDV, was slower than for IAV by about 24 h. The viruses did not interfere with each other if both infected the cells before proinflammatory responses were induced. Coinfection in pigs further demonstrated that IAV interfered with both viral shedding and virus replication of IDV, especially in the upper respiratory tract. Clinically, coinfection of IDV and IAV did not show significant enhancement of disease pathogenesis, compared with the pigs infected with IAV alone. In summary, this study suggests that interference during coinfection of IAV and IDV is primarily due to the proinflammatory response; therefore, it is dependent on the time between infections and the order of infection. This study facilitates our understanding of virus epidemiology and pathogenesis associated with IAV and IDV coinfection.
Keywords: co-infection; influenza A virus; influenza D virus; proinflammatory response; swine; viral interference.