tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Wellcome Open Res
. 2023 Apr 18;8:177.
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19164.1. eCollection 2023. Barriers and enablers to local active travel during COVID-19: A case study of Streetspace interventions in two London boroughs
Maria Lunetto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oscar Castro[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Chiara Gericke[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joanna Hale[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, UK local authorities increased emergency active travel interventions. This study aimed to understand what aspects of temporary Streetspace for London schemes represent barriers or enablers to walking and cycling for short local journeys. Methods: Focusing on two Inner London boroughs, we conducted 21 semi-structured stakeholder interviews and sampled 885 public comments about Streetspace schemes. We triangulated the data in a thematic analysis to identify barriers and enablers, which were categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results: Opportunity and motivation factors were reflected in the barriers (accessibility and integration of the schemes; controversy, dissatisfaction, and doubt) and enablers (new routes and spaces; sustainability and health beliefs) and mixed themes (changes to traffic and appeal of the area; feelings of safety). Capability was not reflected in the main themes. Conclusions: Although aspects of Streetspace schemes were seen to enable active travel, our findings suggest that additional processes to address the acceptability, fairness, and unintended consequences of emergency interventions will be important to their long-term success for health and sustainability.
Keywords: COVID‑19; active travel; behaviour change; infrastructure; intervention; walking and cycling.
. 2023 Apr 18;8:177.
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19164.1. eCollection 2023. Barriers and enablers to local active travel during COVID-19: A case study of Streetspace interventions in two London boroughs
Maria Lunetto[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Oscar Castro[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Chiara Gericke[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joanna Hale[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37663794
- PMCID: PMC10468679
- DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19164.1
Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, UK local authorities increased emergency active travel interventions. This study aimed to understand what aspects of temporary Streetspace for London schemes represent barriers or enablers to walking and cycling for short local journeys. Methods: Focusing on two Inner London boroughs, we conducted 21 semi-structured stakeholder interviews and sampled 885 public comments about Streetspace schemes. We triangulated the data in a thematic analysis to identify barriers and enablers, which were categorised using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results: Opportunity and motivation factors were reflected in the barriers (accessibility and integration of the schemes; controversy, dissatisfaction, and doubt) and enablers (new routes and spaces; sustainability and health beliefs) and mixed themes (changes to traffic and appeal of the area; feelings of safety). Capability was not reflected in the main themes. Conclusions: Although aspects of Streetspace schemes were seen to enable active travel, our findings suggest that additional processes to address the acceptability, fairness, and unintended consequences of emergency interventions will be important to their long-term success for health and sustainability.
Keywords: COVID‑19; active travel; behaviour change; infrastructure; intervention; walking and cycling.