• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Who is making a profit from swine flu?

Laidback Al

Well-known member
August 4, 2009

Who is making a profit from swine flu?


A host of companies and groups are making a packet from tackling the virus

<!-- END: Module - Main Heading --> <!--CMA user Call Diffrenet Variation Of Image --> <!-- BEGIN: Module - M24 Article Headline with no image (a) --> <!-- getting the section url from article. This has been done so that correct url is generated if we are coming from a section or topic --> <!-- Print Author name associated with the article --> <!-- Print Author name from By Line associated with the article --> Anjana Ahuja

<!-- END: Module - M24 Article Headline with no image --> <!-- BEGIN: Module - Main Article --> <!-- Check the Article Type and display accordingly--> <!-- Print Author image associated with the Author--> <!-- Print the body of the article--> <style type="text/css"> div#related-article-links p a, div#related-article-links p a:visited { color:#06c; } </style> <!-- Pagination --> Who knew that misplaced mucus could be such a moneyspinner? The rel-entless headlines about swine flu, and the seemingly contradictory public health advice ? to shut or not to shut schools, whether pregnant women should or shouldn?t venture on public transport ? has provided a window of commercial opportunity for enterprising souls. While it has instigated panic in some quarters, the pandemic has been a business bonanza for others.
So who is fattening up their piggy banks on the back of swine flu, and who else might be rubbing their hands with glee (and antibacterial handwash, of course)?
Drug companies
In terms of the share price, Roche is rocketing and GSK might as well stand for Great Swine flu Killing. The profits being reaped by these companies in the wake of the pandemic have been rising faster than the mercury in an old-fashioned thermometer.
Roche expects to have flogged 2 billion Swiss francs (around ?1.2 billion) of Tamiflu by the end of this year, but what most people don?t realise is that another company, Gilead, actually made the drug and licensed its use to Roche (this kind of alliance allows smaller, innovative companies to harness the marketing muscle of larger companies). Gilead earns healthy royalties on every pack of Tamiflu. Interestingly, Gilead?s board of directors used to be chaired by Donald Rumsfeld, the former US Defence Secretary.
GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) also expects to report a bumper balance sheet for the first half of the year. It manufactures Relenza, an inhaled alternative, suitable for pregnant women, as well as antiviral masks expected to be used widely by healthcare workers during a predicted autumn resurgence. GSK is also the main force behind the swine flu vaccine, which should be ready for delivery in the autumn and will cost about ?6 a shot.
GSK remains rightly unbothered by accusations that it is exploiting the scare, pointing out that it has spent ?2.5 billion researching vaccine development.
Andrew Witty, the chief executive, said this week: ?Swine flu is going to be positive [for GSK], but only because we have put ourselves in a position to do it. And we have done that by taking very significant risks over a long time, diverting a huge amount of resources and doing the research that nobody else has done, so I?m not going to apologise that the company is going to make a return.?
GSK is planning to dole out 50 million free doses to the World Health Organisation, for use in poorer countries. A gesture not to be sneezed at.
Chemists
There is renewed vigour in the sales of vitamin pills, food supplements and other items that supposedly reduce the risk of catching swine flu. Lloyds Pharmacy reported last week that it is selling seven times as many thermometers as this time last year, and, given that swine flu appears be diagnosed primarily on the basis of a fever, chemists can?t restock their shelves fast enough.
Chemists are also processing more prescriptions ? all adding to the sound of ringing tills. Many chemists are now collection points for Tamiflu, which should bring in extra business. The downside is that pharmacists are more likely than the rest of us to come into contact with the virus and therefore become infected. Still, they will also be among the first in line for the vaccine and should have no trouble accessing the necessary drugs.
Soap and tissues
The soap firm PZ Cussons has lathered up a nice rise in sales, particularly of antibacterial handwashes and its Carex range of waterless hand gels. The company benefited from a 16 per cent rise in pre-tax profits to ?89 million for the year to May 31. At the last count, Carex sales were soaring, thanks to, as the company delicately put it, ?additional consumer focus on hand hygiene?.
The magazine Marketing Week reported that when the Government launched its swine flu public information campaign ? with the slogan ?catch it, bin it, kill it? ? sales of Kleenex hygiene kits rose tenfold. The kits comprise two packs of antiviral tissues plus an antibacterial handfoam. Cleaning products are also doing a brisk trade, and cleaning products firm Kimberly-Clark is upping production of face-masks ina bid to cash in.
Firms offering health advice
One of the most written-about risk groups is pregnant women. The Government has issued confusing advice: that they should go about their normal lives, such as going to work and travelling on public transport, because swine flu is mild, but that they should make a special effort to steer clear of those infected. Sir Liam Donaldson, the Chief Medical Officer says that he might advise a more precautionary line in the autumn, if and when the virus makes a robust comeback.
Unsurprisingly, some organisations have seized the opportunity to provide clarification. One is the Zita West Clinic for pregnant women, which is offering 15-minute phone consultations for those worried about swine flu, at a cost of ?45. The consultation, or personal appointment, focuses on lifestyle advice such as how to handle stress, get enough sleep and use probiotics. A vitamin D test is available for an additional ?30. The charity Sense about Science is niffy about the service, and points out that apparently contradictory government advice ?leaves the door open to the promotion of unfounded dietary regimes and lifestyle advice that play on the concerns of pregnant women?.
Dr Andrew Green, a GP in East Yorkshire and a member of the British Medical Association?s National GPs Committee, says that the clinic should be challenged to produce the evidence that any of its interventions reduced a person?s chances of getting swine flu.
Dr Green says: ?Whenever you get a group of worried people, you get another group who seek to make money out of it. My golden rule is to ask advice from someone who doesn?t have a financial interest in the advice they give.
?There?s plenty of authoritative information available from your GP, midwife, NHS Direct or the National Pandemic Flu Service. It?s our job as GPs, whether busy or not, to guide our patients through the minefield of misinformation. Swine flu is almost always a mild illness and even if you are pregnant, the most likely outcome is that you will recover normally, your pregnancy will proceed normally and you will have a healthy baby.?
Another company is offering a pandemic influenza management scheme, for ?49 plus VAT. For that, you get an online medical screening, a prescription and a course of antivirals (most likely Tamiflu, since the company says that it is stockpiling the same drugs as the Government). This sounds suspiciously like the treatment that you?d get through the National Pandemic Flu Service ? free.
The unemployed
Jobseekers queued round the block to earn a three-week placement (or longer) at the call centres for the National Pandemic Flu Service (0800 1513100). There was such a rush to get the thing up and running earlier this month that you didn?t need to have an interview, although you did need to sign up to six hours of training. A manager at Teleperformance, the firm contracted to run the hotline, boasted to an undercover reporter that swine flu would be good for business.
The recession means that the service has been able to recruit 1,500 people, including out-of-work lawyers and graduates. ?These are people who should be very high calibre and who would not usually be thinking of this type of work,? gloated one recruitment manager. The pay is ?6.60 an hour.
Media
OK, time to hold our hands up. Swine flu has been good for journalists, not least because people suddenly became interested in the news again (no mean feat in the summer season). The result has been a widespread pundemic, with such variants as whine flu (formerly known as man flu), wine flu (commonly known as a hangover), line flu (developing a cough while queueing for something) and mine flu (I had it before you).
According to Mariana Bettio, who monitors traffic to the timesonline.co.uk website, swine flu has been a top internet search for weeks and many news organisations, including the BBC and The Times, have benefited (the biggest spike came in May, when the virus emerged). The prevalence of swine flu in 84-point bold, on the front of tabloids, is testament to the virus?s power to shift newspapers.
The virus has also generated considerable online ingenuity. One internet marketing forum includes a page entitled ?Swine Flu Now at Level 6! Profits Jump to Level 10! Why Aren?t You Raking It In Yet?? The forum tells subscribers how to cash in on swine flu being ?one the hottest search terms on Google? and offers articles on swine flu for sale, that can be posted up on blogs or other websites under the buyer?s name. Thirty-seven dollars will buy you a 5,000-word report plus ten blog posts.
Meanwhile, the scope for online joke-swapping has been tremendous: fluBay.co.uk is a laugh, and did you know that a film is being planned, called ?Aporkalypse Now?, with Kevin Bacon in the lead role?
Other potential beneficiaries:
Car parks: If I were a betting woman with a money-grabbing streak, I?d be bagging shares in NCP. Do you really want to spend two hours a day strap-hanging with people who look a bit peaky?
Taxis: Ditto. The obvious solution if you don?t like driving and you don?t fancy public transport ? and you?re a bit flush.
Student tourists: Ever fancied doing Mexico on the cheap? This could be your chance.



http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/health/Swine_flu/article6737507.ece
 
Re: Who is making a profit from swine flu?

There will be opportunistic folks coming out of the woodwork to cash in on the pandemic . Just like in an earthquake or hurricane some folks will jack up prices in emergency supplies. Online purveyers offering advice and Sw flu kits will inundate the net. This is American Capitalism . Take advantage of a crisis to prey on peoples fears and emotions to extract a profit. I have a business background and entrepreneurial bent. I have seen the shady side of business aplenty, and there are sleazy con artists and scammers out there ready to pounce upon folks Pandemic fears to grab dollars from them.
I should just put my investment dollars in Rocke and GSK. I don't normally invest in individual stocks but i may take the plunge on this . Earning 2-3 % on US treasuries and CD's dosen't cut it. Gold is OK now but could take a hit when pandemic hits hard this winter.

Meanwhile i will likely launch a new business this fall( my fifth venture), running an I/C medical supplies delivery business based in LA. Have done medical supplies deliveries before to hospitals, patients, clinics, govt entities, ect. Big opportunity for someone with a bit of upfront investment capital, willing to hustle, in good physical shape, and loves to drive but U have to be a bit on the crazy side to deliver in LA with the traffic and police looking to ticket u at every corner and stop.:tiphat:
 
Re: Who is making a profit from swine flu?

Who is making a profit from swine flu?

Apparently - Anyone who can.


:(


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_iQZiVD_zA

I graduate in December from nursing school (RN), so I guess I will.

The local hospital has been laying off nursing staff, so I guess they will 'profit' also when they get to come back to work and stop drawing unemployment.

We all should be ashamed!

What a thread!:(
 
Re: Who is making a profit from swine flu?

"Unsurprisingly, some organisations have seized the opportunity to provide clarification. One is the Zita West Clinic for pregnant women, which is offering 15-minute phone consultations for those worried about swine flu, at a cost of ?45. The consultation, or personal appointment, focuses on lifestyle advice such as how to handle stress, get enough sleep and use probiotics."

This smells fishy to me. 15 min phone consultation for a fee. Directly deducted out of your credit card acct no doubt. Advice any sensible person could get for free just by going on this site. As i have said the scam companies come out of the woodwork in a crisis.
 
Re: Who is making a profit from swine flu?

SonicHappyHourAddict -
I graduate in December from nursing school (RN), so I guess I will.

Congratulations Sonic!
I don't understand why we should all be ashamed.
Many companies and individuals will profit from the event.
Some provide valuable, but often overlooked products and/or services.
Some will market gimmicks and snake oil and prosper from the widespread fear.

Since becoming concerned several years ago, I have found many wonderful companies who I will continue to do business with, pandemic or no pandemic.

It is what it is - tragedies and emergencies bring out the best and the worst in society - I'm expecting the best to outnumber the worst.
 
Re: Who is making a profit from swine flu?

A personal opinion ,

I had a friend for several years, a graduated PhD from MIT and he always complained to me that heavy administration and commercial orientated business were a nuisance to his science. Could the commercialisation of a virus become a distraction to a scientist in the approach of a full pandemic? I understand that the reward of being a scientist might not be as great. Scientists are always in the shadow of their discoveries and often the credit is given to others. And, I also understand that the parades today are for winning football teams, not astronauts coming back from a mission.

But with the very real threat of this virus , shouldn't a scientist take self gratification exclusively in helping humanity?
 
Re: Who is making a profit from swine flu?

I graduate in December from nursing school (RN), so I guess I will.

The local hospital has been laying off nursing staff, so I guess they will 'profit' also when they get to come back to work and stop drawing unemployment.

We all should be ashamed!

What a thread!:(

Congratulations! Working as a health care worker is hardly profiting from a crisis event. It is hard and often thankless work.

Health care workers are at the backbone of every society.

I admire and respect you.

Thank you for everything that you do.


:applause:
 
Back
Top Bottom