• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

Shiloh

Editor, Senior Moderator
Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/23/health/policy/23who.html?ref=world

W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Bowing to pressure, the World Health Organization announced Friday that it would rewrite its rules for alerting the world to new diseases, meaning the swine flu circling the globe will probably never be declared a full-fledged pandemic.

Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the deputy director general making the W.H.O. announcement, said that he could not predict exactly what the new rules would be but that criteria would include a ?substantial risk of harm to people,? not just the geographic spread of a relatively benign virus.

The six-point system was created in 2005 when the threat was H5N1 avian flu, which has a fatality rate of about 60 percent. But the system does not take into account a virus?s lethality, and in the current outbreak, some countries have complained that the warning system created panic and pressure for border closings, even though the strain was less deadly.

Asked if the W.H.O. could damage its credibility by changing the rules in mid-outbreak, Dr. Fukuda said: ?There?s nothing like reality for telling you whether something is working or not. Rigidly adhering to something that is not working would not be very helpful.?

Speaking in Geneva, Dr. Fukuda added, ?We?re trying to walk a fine line between not raising panic and not being complacent.?

The W.H.O., starting in April, quickly raised its alert level to 4 and then 5 as the virus spread in North America. But even as the virus infected people in Britain, Spain and Japan, the agency did not go to Level 6, which signifies spread to a new continent. Dr. Fukuda argued that there was still no proof of ?community spread,? meaning beyond travelers, schools and contacts. Some experts were skeptical.

While acquiescing, he noted that experts hashed out these issues in 2005. Geographic spread is easy to detect, but severity is highly subjective. Death rates are impossible to calculate before many people are infected; if they turn out to be high, precious time has been lost. Viruses can mutate, becoming more lethal, and even a less lethal strain can kill many people in poor nations with young, malnourished and AIDS-infected populations.

Separately, federal health officials said a study of flu genes released Friday showed that the virus could have been circulating undetected in pigs for years, and called for better surveillance.

The study, published online by Science magazine, was a collaboration between virologists from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the W.H.O., along with others from Mexico, Britain, the Netherlands and the health departments of several American states and New York City.

After sequencing virus genes from 76 Americans and Mexicans and comparing them to known human and pig sequences, the study found no identical matches but concluded that the virus could be in pigs anywhere in the world, said Dr. Nancy Cox, chief of the federal agency?s flu division.

The closest match, surprisingly, was found in Thailand in 2005 ? a pig with both North American and Eurasian flu genes.

Since the outbreak began, virologists have wondered how Eurasian genes got into a North American pig. Live pigs are moved through the Americas fairly easily, but rarely are legally moved across oceans, because they carry diseases. Even a single breeding boar must be tested and quarantined.

Now that the mixed genes have been found in Asia, it is possible that they came from a North American pig that was taken there. There is little flu surveillance of pigs in much of the world, and even in the United States it is ?not very systematic,? Dr. Cox said.

Canadian pig farmers are required to report flu; Americans are not. Early this month, the United States Agriculture Department?s chief veterinarian said it sequenced only 500 samples a year from 100 million pigs.

In 2006, facing the avian flu threat, the United States chicken industry began voluntarily testing 1.6 million chickens a year.

Dr. Paul Sundberg, head of science for the National Pork Board, said it was planning more tests, especially on pigs in contact with people at fairs or livestock exhibits.

Henry L. Niman, who runs a Web site tracking flu mutations, complained that many swine sequences are posted by American universities and in Mexico only on private databases. ?Those sequences would be very useful for figuring out how the H1N1 emerged,? he said.

]The flu[/URL could also be in an intermediate host, said Dr. Cox, as the 2002 SARS virus passed from bats to humans through palm civets. But she said scientists ?don?t have a hypothesis for alternative hosts.? Not enough is known about how many species carry flu, Dr. Cox said. For example, virologists were surprised to learn in 2004 that [URL="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/disease/avian-influenza/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier"]bird flu could kill zoo tigers and house cats.

Dr. Fukuda also said the new virus has been confirmed in 42 countries and had killed 86 people. About half of those hospitalized are young and healthy with no underlying conditions, he said. In the United States, such conditions are more common among the 300 now hospitalized.

Denise Grady contributed reporting.
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

but the geographicl spread _is_ a substantial risk.
Think 1918. Think reassortment.
Just reread all the warnings of WHO itself from
the last weeks.

Who did grant WHO the exclusive right to declare
or define a pandemic ?
Someone else might do it.
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

You sound concerned, gsgs
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

"Bowing to pressure"? Pressure from WHOM?
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

"Bowing to pressure"? Pressure from WHOM?

From governments around the world. The WHO came out with this statement after the US / Mexico and Canadian government officials begged Margaret Chan to take into consideration mortality and not spread as the main criteria for declaring a phase 6 pandemic because mortality rates can be controlled by dawdling on confirmation results as they have been doing since the virus was discovered last month. The WHO must be aware of this strategy and it's very sad they've decided to play into it.

I remember a few years ago I saw a documentary about a possible H5N1 pandemic and it said "if or when a deadly pandemic emerges, governments around the world will do everything in their power to keep this info. from the public at large because if people panic the resulting economic meltdown might prove to be worse than the pandemic itself."
... and that's exactly what they're doing. However, I think it's possible through education to create awareness without panic but.... I guess they don't feel the same way.
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.recombinomics.com/News/05260901/WHO_Phase_Daze.html">Commentary</a>
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

> The closest match, surprisingly, was found in Thailand in 2005 — a pig with both
> North American and Eurasian flu genes.

what's the name of the pig ?

> The flu could also be in an intermediate host, said Dr. Cox,

surprising, that Cox says this. No evidence, AFAIK


so, if this remains mild, we may get it replacing H1N1 and H3N2
but history won't consider it a pandemic later ?
Hard to believe.
If it spreads worldwide and infects 20% of the worldpopulation
and WHO doesn't declare it a pandemic, then someone else
will do it. We will have WHO-pandemics or "super-pandemics"
or such and "normal pandemics"

First they should say, whether 1957 and 1968 qualify as WHO-pandemic.
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30944843/

WHO defends decision not to declare pandemic
Some governments fear it would cause confusion, be politically damaging

updated 1 hour, 53 minutes ago

LONDON - The World Health Organization defended Tuesday its decision not to declare a swine flu pandemic, saying the designation of a global outbreak would not help countries fight the outbreaks.

According to WHO's current pandemic criteria, the world is now in phase 5, meaning a global outbreak is imminent. To reach phase 6, the highest level, the agency's current definition requires established spread of the swine flu in a region beyond North America.

With rising caseloads in Britain, Japan and Spain, some experts suspect the world has already reached the pandemic threshold.

WHO's flu chief Keiji Fukuda said declaring a global outbreak might cause panic or cynicism, and that it would change little about what governments are already doing.

"We are comfortable that countries are doing the kinds of public health actions that they need to be taking right now," he said during a press conference on Tuesday.

WHO has been under increasing pressure from some of its member countries not to announce a pandemic. Many governments fear WHO's declaration of a pandemic would cause confusion and be politically and economically damaging.

Last week, the agency caved in to the pressure, announcing on Friday it would rewrite its criteria for what defines a pandemic.

Fukuda said WHO would be consulting experts in the next few weeks to help rewrite the agency's pandemic criteria. WHO's current requirements for declaring a pandemic refer only to a new flu virus' spread, not its severity.

Fukuda said that if other countries start to report big outbreaks similar to those seen in Mexico and the United States, that could trigger the agency to raise its pandemic alert to phase 6, signifying a global outbreak.

But Fukuda said the agency would try to first consult outside experts before deciding what to do next. "I can't exactly foresee the events over the next weeks," he said.
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

> Fukuda said that if other countries start to report big outbreaks
> similar to those seen in Mexico and the United States, that
> could trigger the agency to raise its pandemic alert to phase 6,
> signifying a global outbreak.

so more virulence won't be needed
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Commentary
http://www.recombinomics.com/News/05260901/WHO_Phase_Daze.html

Excerpt: An earlier revision moved the definition of sustained transmission from phase 6 to phase 4. Since sustained transmission will quickly spread worldwide, the revision simply delayed the inevitable, by defining phase 5 as sustained transmission in a region and phase 6 as worldwide sustained transmission.

This is why I continue to argue for a compromise position of creating a
"Regional Based Level 6". Problem societally is that going straight to the top "Full Blown Level 6" basically uses up all of the Powder in the Gun so to speak. Nothing to fall back on to issue an even more substantial alert if/when the spread combines with greater lethality.

But at the same time - there needs to be some sort of NEW alert given that heightens public awareness. The Sheeple simply won't prepare unless it comes from the top. And under the current convoluted approach - there will be no calls from the top until it is too late.

I hope those in power are thinking about the consequences of an entire nation woefull unprepared - yet left in a position of "You're on your own".

At that point you're going to be talking about something a lot worse than economic damage.
 
Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

Re: W.H.O. Plans to Rewrite Its Rules for Declaring a Pandemic

<a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.recombinomics.com/News/05260901/WHO_Phase_Daze.html">Commentary</a>

Commentary


Hazardous WHO Phase Daze

Recombinomics Commentary 17:54
May 26, 2009

The W.H.O., starting in April, quickly raised its alert level to 4 and then 5 as the virus spread in North America. But even as the virus infected people in Britain, Spain and Japan, the agency did not go to Level 6, which signifies spread to a new continent. Dr. Fukuda argued that there was still no proof of "community spread," meaning beyond travelers, schools and contacts.

The above comment, as well as similar remarks by WHO officials and other government agencies, range from delusional to deliberate distortions with regard to the current phase 6 pandemic. The constant rewriting of the phase system to avoid calling a phase 6 pandemic a phase 6 pandemic does significant harm in the monitoring of the pandemic, as well as raising public awareness of the seriousness of the evolution and spread of swine H1N1.

An earlier revision moved the definition of sustained transmission from phase 6 to phase 4. Since sustained transmission will quickly spread worldwide, the revision simply delayed the inevitable, by defining phase 5 as sustained transmission in a region and phase 6 as worldwide sustained transmission.

However, it was clear when the first swine H1N1 cases in California were confirmed, that the escalation to a phase 6 definition would happen in the near term. The first two cases were over 100 miles apart and had no linkage, indicating sustained transmission was happening in southern California, and the associated reports of H1N1 in Mexico further supported the view that phase six was inevitable and near term.

Expanded testing in the US identified cases throughout the country, which was also found in Canada and Mexico (see <a rel="nofollow" href="http://flutracker.rhiza.com">updated maps</a>. The sequences of these isolates were virtually identical, which again supported sustained worldwide transmission. This view was further supported by the detection of similar cases identified at airport checks worldwide, couple with community spread discovered in association with tracing of airport cases. These cases of community transmission in <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.recombinomics.com/News/05140902/Swine_H1N1_Scotland_6l.html">Europe</a>and <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.recombinomics.com/News/05180901/Swine_H1N1_Japan_6.html">Asia</a> left no doubt that the pandemic was spreading worldwide (see <a rel="nofollow" href="http://flutracker.rhiza.com">updated maps</a>), but most countries continue to focus on airport checks, even though H1N1 was clearly spreading in the community.

The WHO position and phase 5 designation continues to focus efforts away from the real problem of community spread, and hopeless programs focused on international travelers. Although the airport checks can help identify countries which are spreading the virus, such as those in North America, including countries denying infections, such as the Dominican Republic.

These denials of cases, or cases in the community, allow the virus to silently spread and evolve.

The spread of a swine H1N1 in a human population at the current levels has not been reported since the 1918 pandemic. Since the swine virus is now efficiently transmitted in a human host, it will continue to adapt and will likely cause significantly more fatal cases, as was seen in 1918. However, this evolution is being largely ignored because countries are focusing efforts on airport checks, while ignoring/denying community spread. However, the community spread will lead to the emergence of new variants, which will be largely missed because of the misplaced emphasis.

When the new variants are identified, they will have established a strong foothold and will spread rapidly, once again avoiding belated containment efforts. The establishment will speed the spread, which will also impact vaccine efforts, because the identification of the emergent strain will happen well after the spread has accelerated.

Thus, the efforts of WHO to deny phase 6, and misplaced surveillance efforts which target international travel, will accelerate the emergence of variants, which will increase the likelihood that containment and vaccine efforts will fail.

.
 
WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity (Update3)

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ab.YixdwslOo#http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ab.YixdwslOo#http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ab.YixdwslOo#


By Dermot Doherty


May 26 (Bloomberg) -- The World Health Organization said it?s considering adjusting its pandemic alert system to account for the severity of an influenza outbreak.


The agency is responding to a request from Asian health ministers, who met May 8, and from Western countries at the WHO?s World Health Assembly last week, Keiji Fukuda, the agency?s assistant director-general of health security and environment, said today on a conference call with reporters.


Within the next few weeks, the WHO will convene a meeting of scientists to get advice on changing the alert system, Fukuda said. Declaring a pandemic for a virus that mostly has mild effects could cause panic and cynicism without providing any public health benefit, which is the goal of the alert system, Fukuda said.


?That is more important than any definition; that is more important than any discussions,? Fukuda said. ?We are comfortable that the countries are doing the kind of public health actions that they need to be taking right now.?


Dozens of new cases of the virus, formally known as H1N1, emerged in Japan last week, leading to speculation by WHO?s former head in the Western Pacific region to speculate the agency would raise the pandemic alert to the highest level on its six-step scale. Since the swine flu outbreak began in April, there have been 12,954 cases, with 92 deaths, according to WHO, the Geneva-based United Nations agency.


Community Transmission


In the U.S., the virus ?may have passed its peak,? Anne Schuchat, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention interim deputy director for science and public health, said today on a conference call with reporters. That?s based on reports of flu- like illnesses that have returned to normal levels in most of the country, she said.


Flu levels remain high in New York, New Jersey and New England, Schuchat said. New, localized outbreaks may occur, she said. Still, the Atlanta-based agency is likely to turn its attention toward tracking H1N1?s spread in the Southern Hemisphere, as well as preparing for any return in the north this fall, she said. The U.S. confirmed 6,764 cases in 48 states, the CDC said today.


?It is very possible that this virus will continue to circulate and cause illness again next winter? in the U.S., Schuchat said. Whether it returns with more or less virulence ?is not predictable right now.?


New York Deaths


Four New York City residents have died after contracting the H1N1 virus, Thomas Frieden, the city health commissioner, today told reporters. The latest two cases were a 41-year-old woman from Queens and a 34-year-old man from Brooklyn. Both victims had underlying medical conditions that heightened their risk, as did the patients who were the city?s first two swine flu fatalities, Frieden said.


The WHO will consider whether the level of community transmission of a virus, and the severity of its health and social impacts, should be taken into account in declaring a pandemic, Fukuda said today.


On April 29, Margaret Chan, the WHO?s director-general, raised the pandemic alert to 5 from 4. Level 5 means a pandemic, or a global outbreak of a new virus, is near.


Kamnuan Ungchoosak, an official at the Thai Health Ministry?s Department of Disease Control, said in an interview this month that increasing to level 6, which means a pandemic, may cause unnecessary panic over a disease that may be no more deadly than seasonal flu.


Consensus on Flexibility


Kathleen Sebelius, U.S. Health and Human Services secretary, said last week that there is ?broad consensus? among nations that the WHO should have flexibility in declaring a pandemic.


?What is to be gained by going to another phase?? Fukuda said on today?s call. Previous steps helped ?focus everybody?s attention on what needs to be done. It can lead to extra work for countries without much gain. The bottom line is, what is it that we?re going to do that is going to be helpful for people.?


Production of a swine flu vaccine can?t begin until late June or early July, after a seed virus is created and tested by manufacturers, Fukuda said.
To contact the reporter on this story: Dermot Doherty in Geneva

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=ab.YixdwslOo
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

WHO may redefine pandemic alert phases

Robert Roos
purple-speck.gif
News Editor


May 26, 2009 (CIDRAP News) ? In response to concerns from various governments about the possible effects of declaring a full-scale influenza pandemic, the World Health Organization (WHO) will call on outside experts to consider whether to revise the agency's definitions of pandemic alert phases, a WHO official announced today.


The spread of the novel H1N1 flu virus in Mexico, the United States, and Canada prompted the WHO to raise its pandemic alert from phase 4 to phase 5 on Apr 29. Despite signs of possible community-level transmission in other parts of the world, such as Japan and Spain, the WHO has not raised the alert to phase 6, defined as sustained community transmission in more than one global region.


At the WHO's annual meeting last week, several countries, concerned about potentially causing undue alarm, urged the WHO to go slow on moving to phase 6. Noting that most H1N1 cases have been mild, they argued that the pandemic phases should reflect not only the geographic extent of the disease, but also its severity.


Today Dr. Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's assistant director-general for health security and the environment, said the agency would call on scientists and public health experts to consider whether to change the phase definitions.
"What we're currently doing at WHO is trying to take a look at the interventions and see what kind of adjustments might be made to make sure the definitions really meet the situation," Fukuda said at a news teleconference. "To do this, we will be asking scientists and public health people who really have a good perspective on the issues to help us think this through."


He said he hopes this can be accomplished within the next few weeks.
Fukuda said the reasons for the WHO's decision include not only the concerns expressed at the World Health Assembly last week, but also an earlier request from southeast Asian countries at the ASEAN meeting. Officials at that meeting asked the WHO to consider whether the criteria for moving to phase 6 should be adjusted.


He commented that the alert phases were developed a tools to help governments prepare for a pandemic. The phases, he added, were fashioned "in the shadow of avian influenza H5N1," which has caused rare but often lethal human cases, unlike the novel H1N1 virus, which usually causes mild illness.


"The spread of this virus has really highlighted the fact that this is a very different situation than with H5N1," he said.


The WHO is looking very carefully at two questions: what level of transmission "really indicates you have spread in the community" and whether and how to deal with the question of an outbreak's severity, Fukuda reported.


Echoing his comments at a May 22 news briefing, he argued that the most important issue is not the pandemic phase definitions but whether proper public health actions are being taken in response to the disease.
Reporters asked Fukuda why the WHO is so reluctant to go to phase 6, since it officially means only that the virus is spreading in more than one region and says nothing about its severity.


"I think the answer is really almost another question?the question of what is to be gained by going to another phase?" he replied. "When we went from phase 3 to phase 4 and from 4 to 5, there were real gains for countries by doing that, in terms of focusing attention, in terms of implementing actions, in terms of bringing in resources and really focusing everybody's attention on what had to be done."


He added that many countries are already responding appropriately to the epidemic, and that moving to phase 6 could cause unnecessary work and potentially lead to panic and cynicism.


"If we go to phase 6 without very clear evidence that there's a sort of change in the global situation, it can lead to extra work without much gain, it can lead to some level of panic, it can lead to some level of cynicism that something's being declared but is not usefully producing something of public health benefit or gain," he said.


He further observed that the pandemic phase definitions have evolved to become simpler in response to feedback that the earlier versions were too complicated. But now the WHO has found that they don't adequately capture the concerns of countries.


In response to a question, Fukuda said the move to reconsider the phase definitions doesn't necessarily mean the WHO won't declare a pandemic if the epidemiologic situation changes while those deliberations are under way.


"If in another country such as Japan or somewhere in Europe or in the southern hemisphere we begin to see activity that looks much like Mexico or in the US, very large outbreaks with large numbers of people, that in itself could well be enough to take us up to pandemic phase 6," he said.
When a reporter asked if the WHO move might engender cynicism because the agency will be seen as bowing to political pressure, Fukuda cited the swine flu episode of 1976, when the US government launched a nationwide immunization campaign in response to a feared pandemic that never materialized.


Asserting that the most important question is what actions should be taken to protect people, he said, "Perhaps the single biggest lesson from that [1976] episode is to take stock, take a look at what reality is teaching you, don't put yourself in a hole and leave yourself there."
Replying to another question, Fukuda said that even in an informal sense, apart from the official phases, it is premature to call the H1N1 situation a pandemic. He said the virus is clearly spreading but has not reached or taken root in all parts of the world.


"I think it's quite possible that it'll continue to spread and it will establish itself in many other countries and multiple regions, at which time I think it would be fair to call it a pandemic," he commented.


In other comments, Fukuda declined to predict when the WHO might make a recommendation on starting production of an H1N1 vaccine: "Giving some indication from WHO in terms of H1N1 vaccine production will be important sometime during the summer, but right now I don't think I can be much more specific than that."


http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/cidrap/content/influenza/swineflu/news/may2609phases-jw.html
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

I highly recommend everyone listen to the actual briefing here:

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/multimedia/swineflupressbriefings/en/index.html

(The same goes for CDC new briefings)

I've found that listening to the real individuals speaking where you can hear significant pauses, hesitations, and voice inflection helps to decipher what is being communicated. It is much better than reading the transcript, or relying on journalist to edit the briefing down to a few 'talking points' or 'quotes' for press release.

My take, after listening in, is that WHO has made no committments to rewrite anything, only to reconsider. Fukuda, has said that the a dramatic increase in the spread of the virus in the Southern Hemisphere may, in and of itself, be sufficient cause to go to Phase 6. Fukuda also said that a 'factor' may simply be a negative impact of the virus on developing nations, with or without an increase in virulence.

He also stated when asked if we would be a Phase 6 if the virus were H5N1, that WHO would still be looking for evidence of community transmission. As shocking as that was to me, it is consistent with WHO's current position of basing Phases on geographic spread and not virulence.

I'm willing to be patient in spite of my personal suspicion that wealthy, developing nations are having an undue influence in the conversation. But, I'm open to other explanations for whatever happens.
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

WHO May Alter Pandemic Alert System After U.K. Cites Confusion


By Dermot Doherty and Jason Gale
May 27 (Bloomberg) -- The World Health Organization may alter its pandemic warning system after some countries including the U.K. said raising the alert over the current swine flu threat could incite confusion and cause a loss of confidence.

The agency will ask a group of scientists and public health officials for advice on how to improve the decade-oldalert system over the next few weeks, said Keiji Fukuda, the WHO’s assistant director-general of health security and environment. Dozens of cases in Chile and Australia indicate the virus is spreading in communities in the Southern Hemisphere.

U.K. Health Secretary Alan Johnson told the WHO’s annual meeting last week that the organization should have greater flexibility in deciding whether the new H1N1 flu strain is sufficiently serious to raise the pandemic alert to the highest of its six-level scale. The virus causes fever and a cough in most people, unlike the H5N1 bird flu strain which influenced pandemic plans and is lethal in three out of five cases.

“We have a virus spreading which is significantly different to avian influenza,” Fukuda told reporters on a conference call from Geneva yesterday. “Countries are saying we want you to take a look at these criteria because if you apply them in the wrong way, they may not help us, in fact they may cause more difficulties.”

Forty-six countries have officially reported 12,954 cases, including 92 deaths, the Geneva-based WHO said yesterday. The tally excludes 47 new cases in the U.K., 45 in Chile, 42 in Australia, 8 in South Korea, 2 in Ireland and 1 in Singapore that were announced subsequently.

Among Chile’s new cases, 19 resulted from community transmission in four regions, Osvaldo Sagrado, an official in charge of health-care networks at the ministry, said yesterday.

Cases Double

Global cases have more than doubled in the past two weeks as the pig-derived virus became established in countries outside North America, where it was discovered about six weeks ago. Still, the WHO wants to see more evidence of widespread community transmission before declaring the first influenza pandemic since 1968, Fukuda said.

A pandemic occurs when a new strain of flu to which few people, if any, have immunity spreads globally.

“We have an evolving situation in which a new influenza virus is clearly spreading but it has not reached all parts of the world and it has not established community activity in all parts of the world,” Fukuda said.

Disease Severity

Criteria for determining the pandemic alert level need to include disease severity among a broader range of indicators, health ministers from China, South Korea, Japan and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations said in a May 8 statement.

The severity of the new flu strain doesn’t warrant it being described as a pandemic, Kamnuan Ungchoosak, an official at Thailand’s department of disease control in Bangkok, said in a telephone interview today. Thailand holds the rotating chairmanship of the 10-member association.

“Pandemic should refer to something that is severe and has a big impact on the economy and social activities,” Kamnuan said. “At this moment, the mental suffering and social worry is bigger than the physical disease itself.”

“If we announce the pandemic based on the geographical area only, then people will think this is a very bad situation and it will unnecessarily add to social and mental distress,” the official said.

The United Nations agency should have the flexibility to use emerging knowledge about the disease, rather than being driven by a purely “mechanistic approach,” the U.K. health department’s Johnson told WHO Director-General Margaret Chan last week. The recommendation was supported by Japan, China and four other countries, the health department said.

‘Passed its Peak’

In the U.S., the virus “may have passed its peak,” Anne Schuchat, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s interim deputy director for science and public health, said yesterday on a conference call. That’s based on reports of flu- like illnesses that have returned to normal levels in most of the country, she said.

Flu levels remain high in New York, New Jersey and New England, Schuchat said. New, localized outbreaks may occur, she said. Still, the Atlanta-based agency is likely to turn its attention toward tracking H1N1’s spread in the Southern Hemisphere, as well as preparing for any return in the north this fall, she said. The U.S. confirmed 6,764 cases in 48 states, the CDC said.
“It is very possible that this virus will continue to circulate and cause illness again next winter” in the U.S., Schuchat said. Whether it returns with more or less virulence “is not predictable right now.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Jason Gale in Singapore at j.gale@bloomberg.net; Dermot Doherty in Geneva at ddoherty9@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: May 27, 2009 01:46 EDT

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601102&sid=aCmn0xKCGRG0&refer=uk
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

> Level 5 means a pandemic, or a global outbreak of a new virus, is near.

> there is ?broad consensus? among nations that the WHO should have flexibility in declaring a pandemic.

was there also broad consensus when WHO established the phases ?

> What is to be gained by going to another phase?? Fukuda said on today?s call

that WHO doesn't become a laughing number and people won't just ignore the new phases
however they will be "defined"

> Previous steps helped ?focus everybody?s attention on what needs to be done

yes, but they can only do it once. When people recognize that the phases are
meaningless because of WHO "flexibility", then they will no longer pay attention

> Production of a swine flu vaccine can?t begin until late June or early July,
> after a seed virus is created and tested by manufacturers, Fukuda said.

in contradiction to other reports (e.g. statements from Glaxo)
that the seed-virus will be available this week and production
can start immediately (and gain momentum after production
of seasonal flu is finished)


> Replying to another question, Fukuda said that even in an informal sense, apart from the
> official phases, it is premature to call the H1N1 situation a pandemic.

so WHO may declare a pandemic without going to phase 6 ?
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

why do WHO,CDC etc. answer questions spontaneously
in (audio-) briefings rather than by email or on their webpage,
where they can consult,include links, correct mistakes,
where they have more time to think and rethink their replies ?

The quality of the answers would increase and it can better
be followed by observers via keyword-search, old replies
could be archived and were easily available (better than audio-files)


I think, it's the system, reporters and newspapers earn from selling
papers,magazines and require agencies to go through these
briefings and press-conferences rather than using the easier
and cheaper and better and more direct way via webpages.


Also, why is there no discussion forum attached to the websites
of WHO,CDC ? Most questions can be answered by other
visitors, so we needn't bother Fukuda,Schuchat et.al
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

The pandemic phases should remain as they are.

If something has to change, they should simply add a pandemic severity level which can be applied regionally to take account of geographic variations in seasonality and severity.

When the following suggestion was first proposed I had my doubts, but now agree that if there must be change, then it should be introduction and use a pandemic severity scale of 0 = unknown - maximum precautions, 1 = mild and comparable to seasonal flu, 2 = moderate (mortality/ morbidity levels to be defined) 3= severe etc. the severity level attached could be regional and flexible (i.e can go up and down, by geographic region) and thereby trigger different actions at different times and places. A pandemic that was severe in Africa but mild in the US would then qualify for various assistance, directed preferentially towards Africa where the greatest assistance was needed (I would hope)

However, the pandemic definitions should remain as they are. We are in a pandemic, by definition. This mild disease in developed countries and those with health infrastructure could very easily be defined as moderate or severe in third world countries without health infrastructure, and different actions and assistance could be triggered according to the severity scale by region and directed to areas of greatest need. the facts are that we do not yet know what the severity of this novel H1N1 will be in these countires. The WHO should not avoid calling a pandemic simply becuase disease is mild in the Americas.

The WHO is a WORLD health organisation, and not a DEVELOPED world health organisation. I know that every nation is duty bound to look after the interests of its own people above all else - but that is why we have global bodies that can weigh up the needs of ALL and not just a few self interested and powerful nations.
 
Re: WHO May Adjust Flu System to Account for Severity

#19: ...

Correct.


#9 WHO:
""We are comfortable that countries are doing the kinds of public health actions that they need to be taking right now," he said during a press conference on Tuesday."


Apart the high afected areas, such "actions" on the field are not visible, and their invisible part is in idle very begining mode mainly.

Especialy the community containment measures, which are unexistant - free range international people mixing and mingling everywhere - the set up for the perfect spreading.

If it realy would slow now, it would be the preambula for the next wave probably.
 
Back
Top Bottom