tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
World J Clin Cases
. 2023 Sep 16;11(26):6105-6121.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105. Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients
Sahar Kmal Hegazy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samar Tharwat[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ahmed Hosny Hassan[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021-year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevimab antibody combination is a type of new immunotherapy against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes Remdesivir and Favipiravir.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab) compared to standard antiviral therapy in reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
Methods: 265 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction confirmed patients with indication for antiviral therapy were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups (1: 2: 2): Group A: REGN3048-3051 antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), group B: Remdesivir, group C: Favipiravir. The study design is a single-blind non-randomized controlled trial Mansoura University Hospital owns the study's drugs. The duration of the study was about 6 mo after ethical approval.
Results: Casirivimab and imdevimab achieve less need for O[SUB]2[/SUB] therapy and IMV, with less duration of this need than remdesivir and favipiravir.
Conclusion: Group A (casirivimab and imdevimab) achieve better clinical outcomes than groups B (remdesivir) and C (favipiravir) intervention groups.
Keywords: Antivirals; Casirivimab and imdevimab; Coronavirus disease 2019; Favipiravir; Remdesivir.
. 2023 Sep 16;11(26):6105-6121.
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105. Comparing the efficacy of regen-cov, remdesivir, and favipiravir in reducing invasive mechanical ventilation need in hospitalized COVID-19 patients
Sahar Kmal Hegazy[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Samar Tharwat[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Ahmed Hosny Hassan[SUP] 3 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 37731581
- PMCID: PMC10507553
- DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6105
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic stimulates research works to find a solution to this crisis from starting 2020 year up to now. With ending of the 2021-year, various advances in pharmacotherapy against COVID-19 have emerged. Regarding antiviral therapy, casirivimab and imdevimab antibody combination is a type of new immunotherapy against COVID-19. Standard antiviral therapy against COVID-19 includes Remdesivir and Favipiravir.
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab) compared to standard antiviral therapy in reducing the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).
Methods: 265 COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction confirmed patients with indication for antiviral therapy were included in this study and were divided into 3 groups (1: 2: 2): Group A: REGN3048-3051 antibodies cocktail (casirivimab and imdevimab), group B: Remdesivir, group C: Favipiravir. The study design is a single-blind non-randomized controlled trial Mansoura University Hospital owns the study's drugs. The duration of the study was about 6 mo after ethical approval.
Results: Casirivimab and imdevimab achieve less need for O[SUB]2[/SUB] therapy and IMV, with less duration of this need than remdesivir and favipiravir.
Conclusion: Group A (casirivimab and imdevimab) achieve better clinical outcomes than groups B (remdesivir) and C (favipiravir) intervention groups.
Keywords: Antivirals; Casirivimab and imdevimab; Coronavirus disease 2019; Favipiravir; Remdesivir.