Re: Panasonic Says Bringing Workers Families Home Due to Pandemic Fears - Discussion, Economic Considerations, Other Companies Pan/Flu Plans
Thank you very much Supernova. for your answers.
Now the cited moves are a little clearer.
First I shall try to pointing further from the above text lines.
The risk isn't realy considered lower now from my post view:
"... the risk was believed to be higher(!?)."
- I wroted believed (at the time 2005-06) because than this new virus start to agressively killing poultry, and affected new species (mammals/cats) in a relatively short time period, with some human clusters, and the HongKong bird flu (bf) begining scarry ('97) seems to started again - but after 12 years from '97, and 4 years from '05 and the catastrophic pandemic predictions - it remains in its agressive form an primary poultry big numbers killer;
- additionaly the OIE classed it as an "very stable virus" in the meantime;
- there are media reports now that it possible circulate with low incidence and outcomes into many humans with or without symptoms;
So 2005 the risk believed to be higher but nothing happened 4 years, and the mainstream media awareness is quoted as lower risk now,
but realy it could be higher ... :reading:
:yinyang:
The waters remains stil murky.
As readed from your reply, the stockpiles of everything neccessary, are self-financed with a little help.
This can point to an preparedness-only situation, without an near incoming pandemic event.
The above information of workers preparedness self-financing is the right answer to my question why now Panasonic wants to spend money NOW on stockpilling everything neccessary for an pandemic schedule of 3-6 months - they did NOT.
By the self-financing they did not spend anything more, so the Just In Time (JIT) buy/sell schedule and the bad state economic situations worldwide because of the financial colapse - remark means nothing, because Panasonic would not spend any more money with this preparedness stocking at the field, even maybe it would spare more than in case of paying additional fees for the workers divided family living - especialy when nobody knows for how long.
To make a wild shot from the above and the formulation "they don?t know when a flu pandemic will occur", it could be presumed that there is NOT any immediate danger.
Such prediction could be maybe corroborated by the fact that only 1 corp. out of 39 started to realy implement even this low-level worker self-financing preparations.
If indeed the Japan estab. came to the conclusion that actualy the situation is "hot", much hotter than few years ago, than that is not much visible from their corporate moves.
As Florida did comment with an question in her post #159:
"... does Japan's proximity to China, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asia countries who have a history of bird flu infections give Japan some special knowledge that is not in presented in the media in 2009?"
First of all, ?Panasonic did it for economic reasons? is not my theory.
...
to stockpile foods and daily supplies on his own expense. As for antivirals and PPE, his company may give him for free or at a discount price or only help him buy for himself. Because this is for him to stay in his condo during a pandemic. If this were for the workplace use, his company will pay.
I?m not sure what you mean by the word ?Just-in-time? in this contexte.
Paraphrasing, ?Many people feel that they cannnot take such a drastic measure as sending their families back to Japan, because they don?t know when a flu pandemic will occur.? Otherwise, they are separated from their families, without knowing for how long.
Again believe or not, the pandemic flu is a very hot issue in corporate Japan. It wasn't hot two years ago when the rest of the world was hot.
Talking about the risk of a pandemic, was the risk really higher then than now? If candidate viruses are mutating to acquire more human virus attributes, and if a flu pandemic is not a question of "if" but "when", we are inching forward to a flu pandemic everyday. Then, why the risk was considered higher then and is considered lower now?
I think Panasonic ordered to send the expatriate families back home for the safety of the families in the first place. Another reason may be to make the expatriates focus on the Business Continuity Plan. I guess maybe Panasonic is involved in the supply chain of infrastrucure companies and medical institutions.
_________________________
SN1987A
Thank you very much Supernova. for your answers.
Now the cited moves are a little clearer.
First I shall try to pointing further from the above text lines.
The risk isn't realy considered lower now from my post view:
"... the risk was believed to be higher(!?)."
- I wroted believed (at the time 2005-06) because than this new virus start to agressively killing poultry, and affected new species (mammals/cats) in a relatively short time period, with some human clusters, and the HongKong bird flu (bf) begining scarry ('97) seems to started again - but after 12 years from '97, and 4 years from '05 and the catastrophic pandemic predictions - it remains in its agressive form an primary poultry big numbers killer;
- additionaly the OIE classed it as an "very stable virus" in the meantime;
- there are media reports now that it possible circulate with low incidence and outcomes into many humans with or without symptoms;
So 2005 the risk believed to be higher but nothing happened 4 years, and the mainstream media awareness is quoted as lower risk now,
but realy it could be higher ... :reading:
The waters remains stil murky.
As readed from your reply, the stockpiles of everything neccessary, are self-financed with a little help.
This can point to an preparedness-only situation, without an near incoming pandemic event.
The above information of workers preparedness self-financing is the right answer to my question why now Panasonic wants to spend money NOW on stockpilling everything neccessary for an pandemic schedule of 3-6 months - they did NOT.
By the self-financing they did not spend anything more, so the Just In Time (JIT) buy/sell schedule and the bad state economic situations worldwide because of the financial colapse - remark means nothing, because Panasonic would not spend any more money with this preparedness stocking at the field, even maybe it would spare more than in case of paying additional fees for the workers divided family living - especialy when nobody knows for how long.
To make a wild shot from the above and the formulation "they don?t know when a flu pandemic will occur", it could be presumed that there is NOT any immediate danger.
Such prediction could be maybe corroborated by the fact that only 1 corp. out of 39 started to realy implement even this low-level worker self-financing preparations.
If indeed the Japan estab. came to the conclusion that actualy the situation is "hot", much hotter than few years ago, than that is not much visible from their corporate moves.
As Florida did comment with an question in her post #159:
"... does Japan's proximity to China, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asia countries who have a history of bird flu infections give Japan some special knowledge that is not in presented in the media in 2009?"